I think their LOGO are similar, but not completely similar.

I have the following answers to the questions in the title. 1. Do you think the LOGO of the two are very similar?

I think the LOGO of the two are similar, but not completely similar.

Look at the picture. The LOGO of these two brands are formed by the intersection of two vertical semicircles, both of which are a circle with two intersecting circles inside.

actually, to tell you the truth, I see that the two LOGO are completely irrelevant and do not conflict, but the content structure is similar, and it will not make people feel similar at a glance.

I feel that Chanel is a little touched by porcelain. Second, whether it is infringement.

In 219, Chanel sued Huawei, again in the European Union, which clearly meant bullying, but Huawei finally won the case.

The Trademark Office rejected Chanel's appeal in 219, saying that there were no similarities and it was impossible to cause confusion in the public mind.

Later, Chanel was not convinced, and once again questioned the court in Luxembourg and rejected Chanel's appeal. After that, the comprehensive court of the European Union held that the trademarks had some similarities, but their appearances were quite different, and they lost again.

This trademark case started in 217, and Chanel has lost the case again and again. Third, my opinion.

This trademark of Huawei is a registered computer trademark submitted by the European Intellectual Property Office in 217, so Chanel feels infringed.

I think Chanel is touching China Huawei. What is Huawei's measurement and what is Chanel's measurement? There is no contrast between a global high-tech enterprise and a global luxury enterprise, so I think even similarity is Chanel's blessing. Not only did I not steal pleasure, but I also appealed, and I was convinced.

In the final analysis, Huawei didn't infringe this trademark, but Chanel thought it was similar. It can also be said that these two trademarks are not exactly the same, but they are irrelevant.