Legal analysis: Criteria for judging whether a trademark is being used reasonably:

1. In addition to using words and graphics that are the same as or similar to other people’s trademarks, whether there are other explanatory notes Text is judged by showing its "explanatory nature".

2. The judgment standard shall be whether the words and graphics used by the defendant are used as trademarks, or whether the words or graphics are sufficient to identify and distinguish the source of the goods.

3. The judgment criterion shall be whether the significance of the explanatory text is deliberately emphasized when using the explanatory text.

4. The criterion is whether it is also marked with your own trademark.

5. Use business practices and opinions of industry associations as judgment criteria.

6. The judgment standard shall be whether the plaintiff is likely to suffer a decrease in profits and damage to reputation due to the use of the defendant.

Legal basis: "Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China" Article 49 The trademark registrant, during the use of the registered trademark, may change the registered trademark, the registrant's name, address or other registration information on his own initiative If any matter is found, the local industrial and commercial administrative department shall order it to make corrections within a time limit; if it fails to make corrections within the time limit, the Trademark Office shall revoke its registered trademark.

If a registered trademark becomes the common name of the goods approved for use or is not used for three consecutive years without justifiable reasons, any unit or individual may apply to the Trademark Office to cancel the registered trademark. The Trademark Office shall make a decision within nine months from the date of receipt of the application. If there are special circumstances that require an extension, it can be extended for three months with the approval of the industrial and commercial administration department of the State Council.