1. The plaintiff thinks that its trademark Yuecheng enjoys high popularity and good reputation, and the trademark Yuecheng Xinyuan used by the defendant is similar to its trademark, which is easy to be confused and infringes on its trademark right.

2. The plaintiff thinks that the defendant's unauthorized use of similar trademarks has constituted infringement, and requests the court to order him to stop the infringement and compensate the corresponding economic losses and reasonable expenses. The defendant's main defense.

1. The defendant thinks that its trademark Yuecheng Xinyuan is obviously different from the plaintiff's trademark Yuecheng, which will not cause confusion and does not constitute trademark infringement.

2. The defendant thought that he used the trademark earlier, and clearly pointed out the word Xinyuan in his advertisement, and there was no malicious imitation of the plaintiff's trademark.