Recently, one? Chanel v. Huawei logo infringement lost? The news triggered a heated discussion among netizens and caused a heated discussion on the Internet. We know that with the development of society, there are enterprises and companies in all walks of life, and each enterprise will have its own unique trademark. However, there are so many companies in the world, so it is inevitable that there will be some similar situations on the trademark. But there are still some, that is, deliberately imitating some big brands. For example, the previous Jiaduobao imitated the bottle of Wang Laoji, which led to the end of Wang Laoji and Jiaduobao's lawsuit for several years. Hooliganism like this and imitation of biscuit brands? Oreo Some brands, such as? Guangdong benefits Guangdong? Something like that. Then this time Chanel brought Huawei to court, so why did Chanel sue Huawei? What is the basis?

1. Double C

Chanel sued not the logo of Huawei's mobile phone, but the one of Huawei's cars? Double c? The logo, and we know that Chanel's logo is also? Double c? Style, so Chanel sued Huawei for infringement based on this similarity.

2. Official answer

However, the official answer is that there is no infringement, specifically because of Huawei? Double c? It's a vertical one, while Chanel is horizontal, and it's easy to tell at a glance that these are two different logo, so there is no counterfeiting and it's not easy to be confused.

III. Summary

As a big company, Huawei really doesn't need to imitate Chanel at all. It is two completely different industries. I believe this is just a simple coincidence and support Huawei.

The above is my opinion on this issue, which is purely personal and for reference only. You can leave a message in the comment area if you have any different opinions, and let's discuss it together.