It was adopted at the 1202nd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court on December 24, 2018. It is hereby announced and will no longer apply as of December 28, 2001.
>
(The Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court passed the Judicial Interpretation [2001] No. 32 at its 1202nd meeting on December 24, 2001
)
Preface
Name of Judicial Interpretation No.
Issuance date and document number
Reasons for revocation
1
The Supreme People’s Court’s Notice on the Bequest of Property to Overseas Chinese in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Reply to the issue of whether Chinese citizens should be valid
Eastern France on June 14, 1951
No. 2842
has been On April 10, 1985
The National People's Congress has
passed and promulgated the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the Succession of the People's Republic of China
p>
》Replace 2
The Supreme People's Court's Notice on Handling Foreign Affairs Cases
If there is no foreign affairs office in the local area, you can contact the nearest provincial or municipal people's government
Foreign Affairs Office Notice of the Legal Supervisor on September 26, 1951 for contact processing
(1) No. 5
The situation has changed and it has actually expired
< /p>
3
The Central and Southern Branch of the Supreme People's Court notified the Soviet Union of abolishing the ban on marriage between Soviet citizens and foreigners on June 14, 1954 (54)
p>
The adjustment object of Ban Mi Fa Zi No. 87 has disappeared,
It has actually expired 4
The Supreme People's Court regarding the Polish court's decision on both parties
Reply to the issue of whether the divorce judgment of Chinese expatriates living in Poland
has legal effect in China
Letter
May 4, 1957< /p>
Faxingzi No. 8490
Promulgated by the Supreme People's Court on August 13, 1991
Issue [19
91] No. 21 "The Supreme People's Court's Notice on Chinese Citizens' Application for Recognition of Foreign Court Divorce" Provisions on Judgment Procedure Issues
" instead of 5
The Supreme People's Court's Approval on How to Handle Issues for Chinese Koreans
Citizens Applying for Divorce
p>
Revised August 22, 1962 [
62] Faxingzi No. 160
Has been dated February 1, 1994
The "Marriage
Registration Management Regulations" issued by the State Council replaces the 6
Supreme People's Court's approval that divorce judgments can be sent directly
to the parties in Hong Kong< /p>
February 25, 1963 [
63] Fayanzi No. 21
Has been replaced by March 29, 1999
The highest
Fa Interpretation [1999] No. 9 "
About the Mutual Entrustment of the Courts of the Mainland and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Sent by the People's Court
Judicial Interpretation of the Arrangement of Civil and Commercial Judicial Documents
Replacing 7
The Supreme People’s Court’s statement on the relationship between the requirements of Chinese citizens and
has been Reply to divorce issue for Japanese returning home
July 7, 1964 (64)
Fayanzi No. 64
Has been approved by February 1994 1st
The State Council issued the "Marriage
Registration Management Regulations" on behalf of
8
The Supreme People's Court regarding Li Shufen and Huang Zhengkuan
p>Approval of the divorce case
November 16, 1964 (64)
Min Ta Zi No. 60
The main content is the same as that of 1994
The State Council promulgated on February 1
"Marriage Registration Management Regulations
Regulations" are inconsistent with 9
The Supreme People's Court regarding Zhu Yuqin With Ryo Yamada
Approval of divorce issue
July 28, 1978 (78)
>Fa Min Zi No. 18
With March 4, 1992
Supreme People's Court,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Justice
Issued Waifa [19
92] No. 8 "About Enforcement
" About Service of Civil or Commercial Matters Abroad
< p>Judicial Documents and Administration of JusticeForeign Documents Convention>Notice on Relevant Procedures
Inconsistency 10
Supreme People's Court Notice on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Cases involving Foreign Maritime Diplomacy
Transportation Accidents
December 30, 1983 (83)
Fajingzi No. 8
Has been passed and promulgated by the National People's Congress on December 25, 1999
***The Special Procedure Law for Maritime Litigation of the People's Republic of China replaces 11
Notice of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Conduct of Patent Trial Work
Law of February 16, 1985
(Jing) [1985] No. 3
Has been passed on August 25, 2000
The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress
has amended and
announced the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China
and the 1997 Patent Law of the People's Republic of China
and 1997
The "Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China
revised and promulgated by the National People's Congress
on March 14, 2012 replaced the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China
The Supreme People's Court regarding whether counselors of embassies stationed abroad can
act as diplomatic representatives on behalf of their own nationals in civil litigation in our country
Hire Chinese lawyers to represent them< /p>
Reply on Litigation Issues
March 28, 1985
(1985) Minta Zi No. 5
Has been approved in 1992 July 14th
The Supreme People's Court issued
Fafa [1992] No. 22 "
The Supreme People's Court on Applicability
Replace 13 with the "Opinions on the Civil Procedure Law" on certain issues
"
Can the personnel of the Chinese Consulate serve as litigation agents?
Article 1 of the approval question
June 8, 1985 (85)
p>
Minta Zi No. 3
Has been issued by the Supreme People's Court on July 14, 1992
Fafa [1992] No. 22 "Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on the Appropriate Application of the Civil Procedure Law" replaces 14
The Supreme People's Court's Reply on how to calculate the amount of compensation for trademark infringement and the period of infringement
November 6, 1985
>Jingfu (1985) No. 53
And October 27, 2001
Amended and announced by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress
/p>
The "Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China
is inconsistent with 15
The case of the Supreme People's Court on patent infringement disputes
Notice on territorial jurisdiction issues
Issued on June 29, 1987
Has been issued by the Supreme People's Court on June 22, 2001
Fa Interpretation [2001] No. 21 "
Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Application of Legal Issues in the Trial of
Patent Dispute Cases
p>》Judicial interpretation instead of 16
The Supreme People's Court on copyright (copyright)
Whether works owned by the organizer infringe upon individuals
Copyright approval
December 31, 1987 [
1987] Minta Zi No. 24
Has been approved on October 27, 2001
The National People's Congress has
amended and promulgated the "China"
>The Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China
Replaces 17
The Supreme People's Court's Divorce Judgment of Foreign Courts
Chinese litigants to the People's Court Application
Approval of the issue of recognition of the validity of the divorce judgment of the foreign court
Law of August 28, 1990
Civil Restoration Word [1990] No. 12
Has been issued by the Supreme People's Court on August 13, 1991
Law (Civil) Issue [1991]
p>No. 21 "Regulations of the Supreme People's Court
on Chinese Citizens' Application for Recognition
of Divorce Judgments of Foreign Courts
Procedural Issues" Act
p>For 18
The Supreme People's Court's Answers to Several Questions Concerning the Trial of Patent Dispute Cases
Law of February 9, 1992
p>
Fa [1992] No. 3
Has been issued by the Supreme People's Court on June 22, 2001
Legal Interpretation [2001] Judicial Interpretation No. 21 of the "
Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Application of Legal Issues in the Trial of
Patent Dispute Cases
" Replacement 19
Notice of the Supreme People's Court on the Study, Publicity and Implementation
of the Maritime and Commercial Law of the People's Republic of China
November 18, 1992 Japan
Fafa [1992] No. 37
The applicable period has expired,
it has actually expired
20
Reply from the Supreme People's Court on whether the economic losses caused by the overdue delivery of waterway goods
due to the drop in the price of the goods should be compensated
1995 On December 7, 1995 [
1995] Submitted to him No. 7
The original basis of the "Republic of China
Republic of China Economic Cooperation< /p>
Same Law" and "Waterway
Goods Transport Rules"
, "Waterway Goods Transport
Contract Implementing Rules
》The relevant provisions of this judicial interpretation
are no longer applicable