1. What is the standard of compensation for malicious registration of trademarks? According to the Interpretation on Several Issues Applicable to Laws in the Trial of Civil Disputes involving Computer Network Domain Names recently adopted by the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People’s Court, the court determined that the domain name If the registration, use and other activities constitute infringement or unfair competition, the defendant may be ordered to stop the infringement, cancel the domain name, or the plaintiff may be ordered to register and use the domain name at the request of the plaintiff; if actual damage is caused to the right holder, the defendant may be ordered to compensate loss. How much compensation can be awarded depends on the actual loss and the request made to the court. 2. Constitutive Conditions The Interpretation on Several Issues Applicable to Laws in the Trial of Civil Disputes involving Computer Network Domain Names recently passed by the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court, regarding the cause of action, acceptance conditions and jurisdiction of domain name dispute cases of public concern, domain name registration, use and other behaviors The conditions for constituting infringement, the bad faith of the perpetrator and the determination of the fact that the trademark is well-known in the case are all stipulated. Determining whether the defendant's registration and use of domain names constitutes infringement or unfair competition is the key to correctly hearing domain name disputes in accordance with the law. This judicial interpretation clearly stipulates four conditions for an actor's registration and use of a domain name to constitute infringement or unfair competition: First, the civil rights and interests requested by the plaintiff to be protected are legal and valid. Second, the defendant’s domain name or its main part constitutes a copy, imitation, translation or transliteration of the plaintiff’s well-known trademark; or is identical or similar to the plaintiff’s registered trademark, domain name, etc., which is enough to cause misunderstanding by the relevant public. Third, the defendant had no legitimate reasons for registration and use. Fourth, the defendant had malicious intent. 3. Regarding the actual situation of Internet domain name disputes, the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court lists the four most common malicious situations: First, registering someone else's well-known trademark as a domain name for commercial purposes; Second, registering and using it for commercial purposes The domain name is the same as or similar to the plaintiff’s registered trademark, domain name, etc., intentionally causing confusion with the products and services provided by the plaintiff or the plaintiff’s website, and misleading Internet users to access its website or other online sites; third, it has offered to sell, rent or Transferring the domain name in other ways to obtain illegitimate benefits; fourth, registering the domain name and not using it or preparing to use it, but intentionally preventing the right holder from registering the domain name. As long as one of these situations is involved, the court can determine that the defendant has subjective bad faith. Malicious trademark registration is a type of vicious commercial competition, which brings severe economic losses to legitimate business activities. The law stipulates that those who maliciously register trademarks and cause serious commercial losses to the parties can be held legally responsible, and their improper trademark use can be canceled according to the loss procedures. They can also submit to the judicial authorities for compensation based on the actual losses caused.