Specifications: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.80GHz
Process: 90 nm
Main frequency: 2.80 GHz
Frequency multiplier: Instruction cache: 12 KB-uOps, 8-Way set associative
Level 2 cache: 256 KB, 4-Way, 64 byte lines
Socket: Socket 775
p>Series model Celeron (Celeron) D
Socket structure Socket 775
Clock frequency (GHz) 3.33
Number of pins 775Pin
p>
Technical parameters
Level 2 cache capacity (KB) 512KB
Core voltage 1.25V-1.300V
Packaging technology PLGA
Core type Cedar Mill
64-bit technology Intel 64 (EM64T)
Front-side bus 533MHz
System FSB 133MHz
Production process (micron) 65 nanometers
Frequency multiplication 25
Functional parameters
Multimedia instruction set MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
Hyper-threading technology is not supported
The production process of Celeron(R) 2.80GHz is 90 nanometers, which is not as good as the 65 nanometers of D356. This is mainly from the perspective of power consumption. Obviously D356 is more energy efficient.
In terms of performance, D356 beats Celeron(R) 2.80GHz in terms of clock speed and cache, so D356 is also better in terms of performance
What’s more, D356 is dual-core and Celeron(R) 2.80GHz It goes without saying which one is better, single core, single core or dual core?