The online picture of vision china Copyright Gate belongs to the European Southern Observatory.

This photo license is not exclusive, and other media and photo agencies have also been authorized. However, according to the requirements of the copyright owner, the picture can only be used for news editing and dissemination, and it cannot be used as a commercial category without permission.

Supplement

The copyright gate in vision china refers to the photo copyright labeling storm caused by the "black hole" photo copyright problem on vision china website.

On the afternoon of April 11th, 219, the official website of the Central Committee of the Youth League of * * * released two screen shots of the Chinese people's * * and national flag and national emblem provided by the vision china website, asking, "Is the copyright of the national flag and national emblem also yours?" .

On the evening of April 11th, Tianjin Netcom Office interviewed vision china website overnight, and ordered the website to immediately stop its illegal activities and make comprehensive and thorough rectification. On April 12th, vision china issued a letter of apology in "VCG vision china", saying that he would accept the supervision and criticism of netizens and the media, and fully cooperate with the regulatory authorities for thorough and active rectification.

On April 12, 219, vision china sent another letter of apology: offline the non-compliant pictures and voluntarily shut down the website to carry out rectification.

On April 12, 219, the National Copyright Administration announced that it would include the protection of picture copyright in the upcoming "Sword Net 219" special campaign to further standardize the copyright order in the picture market.

On April 12, 219, Tianjin Netcom Office set up a work supervision team to station in vision china website.

On April 18th, 219, vision china announced that Tianjin Netcom Office had imposed an administrative penalty of 3, yuan on Hanhua Yimei Tianjin, and the company would pay the fine on schedule.

On May 12, 219, vision china resumed the online operation of the website and began to provide comprehensive services to customers. On May 2th, eight days after the resumption of operation, official website, vision china "suspended its visit" again. On December 1, 219, "Net Letter Beijing" released a message saying that the National Network Information Office instructed the relevant local network information offices to interview the person in charge of the vision china website, and the website service was suspended and completely rectified from now on. How strong is vision china's background? How dare he collect copyright fees for stealing other people's photos?

Actually, it's not that vision china's background is strong, but that people's awareness of copyright is not strong now, and ordinary people forget it when they encounter such a thing, and think it's nothing.

vision china is such an opportunist, that is, he thinks that no one will take care of or ignore such infringement.

Fortunately, vision china overturned the car this time. It can be said that his rollover is very good, because it not only makes people know the awareness of copyright again, but also makes us understand that if one day we find that we have been infringed, we can directly use legal weapons, which is simple, clear and quick.

We should pay attention to some specific behaviors at ordinary times, such as the copyright of some movies is sometimes bought out by websites. If we want to pay attention to copyright, we should stop our habit of watching pirated movies. Secondly, don't adapt other people's works at will. The promotion of copyright awareness is sometimes not only an aspect we attach importance to, but sometimes we can lose our integrity because we don't have a good copyright awareness. Protecting your own copyright is also a manifestation of copyright awareness.

China's awareness of intellectual property rights has been gradually enhanced, which is a very good phenomenon. You can see that many enterprises have registered trademarks at the beginning of their establishment. This is the most basic common sense, especially for some film and television works, and copyright is particularly important. For example, there are intellectual property mistakes in Wolf Warriors 2, which fully shows the importance of intellectual property rights.

So, although our awareness of copyright has been gradually enhanced, there is still a phenomenon of infringement, such as vision china this time.

If no one sues him in court this time, it is estimated that no one will think that he is infringing the copyright of others. How to evaluate vision china's behavior of "asking for sky-high compensation through picture infringement"? How to treat the current situation of using self-media pictures?

In fact, this wave of pot is not the responsibility of the media at all. For example, when we often search for pictures when writing articles, we must use search engines to screen keywords. But in fact, for example, there are some logo of so-called picture companies in the lower right corner, which we basically won't adopt.

in other words, it's not that the copyright awareness of the entire media industry is weak, but that the copyright is unclear. That is to say, for example, you can't judge whether some pictures are currently within the copyright scope, and there is no so-called logo or watermark to indicate the copyright of this picture. That is to say, media often adopt such photos, thinking that they are very safe.

But in fact, many well-known media outlets have been sued for similar infringement. That is to say, it is somewhat similar to a way that Microsoft cracked down on piracy in the past. First, let you use unknown so's, and then wait for a period of time to seize the evidence and start prosecution, and instead of accepting an apology for deletion, you can directly claim compensation.

This is what makes the whole public angry. We say that no one says that they don't respect copyright and intellectual property rights, but because intellectual property rights and copyrights should be used in a reasonable and compliant way, not the so-called fishing law enforcement. In some cases, vision china's practice is indeed suspected of fishing law enforcement.

At the same time, according to a disclosure made by Jingwei China Zhang Ying, that is to say, at present, vision china has developed a system of its own, and it is a system that has invested heavily to pursue the subject of infringement. This is obviously contrary to the concept of the copyright era.

It is worth noting that whether vision china can correctly explain the copyright of the pictures he owns at present is still two different things. However, the author is very cautious and never dares to use it. The photo with vision china watermark may feel that this company is not easy to mess with from its name.

Today, the Youth League Committee of * * * directly criticized vision china by name on the social platform, and vision china did really badly in some aspects.

The Youth League Committee of * * * has also left vision china a little face. You know, the Youth League refuted vision china's content after vision china closed. If it doesn't close today, I personally think that vision china is likely to experience a roller coaster.

For people from the media, you should pay attention to the use of pictures. There seems to be a search engine that can identify the so-called copyright!

Of course, if you can use your own photos, you can rest easy.