This is definitely impossible. In fact, it seems that the two sides have reached a mediation opinion, that is, the other side has modified the pear-shaped icon, which does not seem to overlap too much.

In this case, from the outside world, it seems that Apple is bullying the small. After all, there is no comparability between the two companies. Moreover, the business scope of the two companies is not the same. Some of them are like the former Haidilao and River Bottom Fishing, and it feels that this lawsuit is a waste of judicial resources.

at present, it seems that the only condition for the other party to reach a settlement is to modify the trademark logo, and try not to look too similar, so as to avoid further disputes.

Undoubtedly, for the entrepreneurs of the company, we should learn this lesson and make great changes when designing fruit trademarks in the future. Don't be completely similar, otherwise you may be wronged by the lawsuit, which is obviously not cost-effective.

nowadays, people's awareness of law is gradually improving, especially manufacturers, who attach great importance to trademarks. When they find that they infringe on their own interests, they will choose legal means to protect their legitimate rights and interests, especially fruit trademarks.

It is easy to become the hardest hit area because of its great similarity. In this respect, operators must pay attention to it, try to distinguish the two and never make the same mistake. This case is also a warning for enterprises, just like fishing in the sea and fishing in the river.

we must pay enough attention to this aspect, and we must be alert to the registration right of logo trademarks and the fields involved, so as to solve some problems at the root, and this aspect will improve the innovation of logo stores and the content and other fields at a higher level.

In fact, this case does not emphasize that fruit trademarks can't be used in the future. In fact, in addition to fruits, animal trademarks are widely used now, but many enterprises also distinguish them when using them. Just like Yili and Mengniu are both dairy products, but the trademarks of the two companies are completely different. Naturally, there is no need to go to court and waste judicial resources. For peer companies, it will also be very enlightening, and it may become healthy competition. Why bother?