With the rapid popularization of broadband in our country and the continuous increase in speed, people have higher and higher requirements for network quality, and there are more and more diversified Internet demands. From the past when only desktop computers needed broadband networks to today's rapid popularization of smart homes, the need for networking is no longer the need for ordinary desktop computers. Many large and small devices in our home environment require network support to achieve better results. working status. Let’s put aside the inseparable mobile phones. Some large home appliances such as air conditioners, refrigerators, TVs, etc. in our homes need to be connected to the Internet. Even small thermometers need to be connected to the Internet to allow us to check the indoor temperature anytime and anywhere.
Changes in networking needs have also put forward new requirements and heights for routers in our homes. Not only must the Internet speed be fast and the signal coverage be wide, but it must also be able to support many smart devices online at the same time and maintain good performance. Internet quality. For this reason, the routers at home are facing upgrading to meet existing needs. Xiaozhi selected a relatively popular and affordable router of around 200 yuan on a large e-commerce platform, and found Huawei's WS5200 quad-core version. It is more popular with the TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version, priced at 244 yuan and 199 yuan respectively. Today I will use these two routers for a face-to-face test to see which one is better, the WDR7660 Gigabit version of TP-Link, a traditional routing manufacturer, or the Huawei WS52200 quad-core version, which is excellent in communication equipment in the commercial field. Because the names are long, they will be referred to as 5200 and 7660 below.
1. Appearance
The two routers have their own characteristics in appearance design. Let’s talk about Huawei’s 5200 first. First of all, from the outer packaging, Huawei still uses the more classic white and red color combination. If you are familiar with Huawei routers, you can tell at a glance that this must be a routing product produced by Huawei.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version vs. TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version vs. TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
p>
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
There is a rendering and name of the router on the front of the package, and the router's information is also listed below the name. Main highlights. The back is an introduction to product specifications and highlighted features. Opening the package, the contents inside the package are relatively simple. In addition to the router, it also comes with an instruction manual and a power cord.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
The router adopts a white design as a whole, with 4 large external antennas that are eye-catching and also It has a foldable function of about 90°, which is more convenient for storage. There are also 4 signal amplifiers inside the router to amplify the power of 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wi-Fi signals respectively. With 4 wide antennas, theoretically there will be good signal quality. The official claims that the coverage range is significantly improved by 50% compared to the first generation. %, and will be tested in practice later.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
The center part of the front of the 5200 fuselage is an exclusive "H" button for Huawei routers. This button can quickly pair with other Hua routers or other smart home devices with Hilink labels. When the indicator light automatically changes to slow flashing, press the H button to quickly connect the device to the 5200 router, which is very convenient and fast. . In addition, the H key of the router also has a WPS key function to facilitate users to set up the router. Under the H button is the Huawei logo.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
In addition to the nameplate information at the bottom, there are heat dissipation holes on both sides for heat dissipation, towards the middle There are also 4 protruding support legs at the position, and there are rubber pads at the back to provide anti-slip effect.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
The rear power interface of the router, 4 "blind ports" and a reset button .
Why is it called "blind mouth"? First of all, the four network cable interfaces of Huawei 5200 are not divided into WAN and LAN, and the four ports are all full-speed Gigabit network ports. This design can be said to be very user-friendly and considerate, and is suitable for most girls who do not understand network configuration and connection. It is very convenient for Xiaobai users. You can connect to the network by plugging it in at will, which greatly improves the convenience. Like it.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
In the preface of the router is a working indicator light. Green means that the network is normal and the Internet can be accessed, red means The network is abnormal and the network status needs to be checked.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
Overall, this Huawei router looks relatively simple and elegant, with a versatile white color placed on it The home environment is also relatively harmonious. Although the router is a device that works silently in the corner, Huawei's 5200 router looks more elegant and delicate even if you want to put it on the open side. The white color is not easy to be contaminated by dust and fingerprints. Better to clean.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
Let’s take a look at the 7660 Gigabit version of TP-Link. The outer packaging is designed in blue. The box is relatively large, with a rendering of the router on the front, and a large AC1900 printed on it, highlighting its performance indicators. The back also introduces some functional highlights.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
In addition to the router, the package also comes with a power cord, instructions and a CAT5E Category 5e Network cable.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
The router adopts a black design as a whole. At first glance, it is also attracted by this unique shape and Attracted by the 6 external antennas, the antennas can also be folded about 90° from horizontal to vertical, and also support 180° rotation, which can meet diverse placement requirements. However, I looked at the lower back and there is no wall hanging hole. , so this is not of much use. The overall shape of the 7660 is a diamond-shaped design, with a combination of two textures on the top. There is also a power indicator light in the center, which does not change color according to the network status. Below is the TP-Link logo.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
The center of the bottom also has nameplate information, and there are large area heat dissipation holes up and down. There are 4 supporting feet at the bottom, but unfortunately they are not anti-slip.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
The power interface, reset button and 4 network cable interfaces are distributed on the back, but they are not as good as Huawei's The good design of the 5200 is that 3 of the 4 ports are Lan ports and one port is a WAN port. They cannot be operated by "blind plugging".
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
The overall texture of TP-Link 7660 is worse than that of Huawei 5200, although the size is The 5200 is larger, but the weight is almost the same, and the black spray paint is easier to attract dust and fingerprints. In addition, the texture design on it may make it more laborious to clean up the daily dust.
2..Mobile APP page function design
In order to make networking more convenient and convenient for users, now both emerging Internet companies and traditional established companies have done so on the mobile Internet. We are all trying to make it possible for a mobile phone to manage the devices in the home, including routers. Take today's two mobile APPs as an example. With Huawei's years of deployment in civilian routers and smart homes, the mobile APP page design is relatively complete, and the page beauty and interaction are much better than TP-Link.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
After comparison, it is not difficult to find that the design and function list of Huawei’s APP page on the left seems to have The work of designers with rich experience, the page content is rich and detailed. The TP-Link on the right looks like the work of a student who has just graduated. The page is rough and the function list is messy.
3. Usage experience and signal strength test
The two routers are mainly targeted at home users. As wireless routers, wireless coverage and signal quality are definitely the most important concerns for consumers. Yes, better signal coverage and signal quality can bring a seamless Internet experience. Facing various home layouts, it also poses a lot of challenges to various router manufacturers. So Huawei’s 5200 quad-core version Which one has better performance than TP-Link's 7660 Gigabit version? Xiaozhi also conducted an actual test below.
Evaluation of Huawei Router WS5200 Quad-Core Version vs. TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit Version
First of all, let’s talk about the test environment. Xiaozhi’s office area is divided into 2 large areas, one It is the main office area, and the other is the storage room, which is separated from the test router by a metal door and a cement wall. During the test, we placed the two routers in the same location, then selected three different test locations ABC, and used the same mobile phone to test through the SPEEDTEST network speed test APP. It is also worth noting that both routers support the dual-band optimization function, which means that they can integrate the 2.4GHz frequency band and the 5GHz frequency band into one wireless name. As long as the device connects to the router through this wireless name, the router will automatically Automatically allocate bandwidth frequencies based on connected devices. In order to avoid interference with the test results, we used the test software to test each router and each node three times in a row, and took their maximum value. The other two routers were tested using CAT6 network cables of the same specification and brand.
In addition, since the layout of Xiaozhi’s office area is not as complicated as that of our home, in order to verify the signal coverage and signal quality of the two routers as much as possible, we chose the door 5 meters outside the company area in the C point area. place to simulate a place far away from the router in a home environment.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version vs. TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
Let’s first look at the performance of the two routers at point A. The environment is relatively open, and the test points are There is no obstruction between routers. You can see that Huawei's 5200 has a maximum download speed of 261Mbps and an average upload speed of 38.3Mbps, while TP-Link has a maximum download speed of 249Mbps and an upload speed of 38Mbps. The speed of A node TP-Link is worse than Huawei's 5200 in terms of download speed and upload speed.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
Move to point B for testing. The test environment becomes the storage room. The test point is the same as There is a cement wall and metal door separating the routers, and the SPEEDTEST software is also used to measure the speed. It can be seen that Huawei's 5200 has a download speed of 232Mbps and an upload speed of 38Mbps, while TP-Link's download speed is 195Mbps and the upload speed averages 37.8Mbps. The download and upload speeds of both routers are lower than those of node A, but the Huawei 5200 is still better than TP-Link at this node, and the decrease is not very large.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
Finally, let’s look at the test results of point C, which is relatively far away and has more obstructions, because the distance is relatively small Both routers were unable to stably search for signals at the 5GHz frequency, so they tested the signal speed and quality at the 2.4GHz frequency. In order to ensure the objectivity and accuracy of the data, all tests were conducted three times and the average was taken. It can be seen that the average download speed of Huawei's 5200 is 11.05Mbps and the average upload speed is 3.59Mbps, while the average download speed of TP-Link is 9.46Mbps and the average upload speed is 4.83Mbps.
In areas where the signal coverage is relatively poor, the Huawei 5200 still wins. It can be seen that the signal coverage and quality of the Huawei 5200 router are still very good. This is also due to the Huawei Lingxiao quad-core 1GHz processor. When combined with excellent software Optimization makes the router perform great. TP-Link uses a single-core processor, and its performance is still not as good as Huawei 5200. Although it has more antennas and a larger appearance, the signal coverage and quality are still worse.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version versus TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
Generally speaking, Huawei’s WS5200 quad-core version and TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version Compared with the previous version, in open environments and medium-distance environments, the download and upload speeds are better than those of TP's 7600. However, in the case of longer distances and poor signal quality, the download speed of Huawei's 5200 is still higher. It is better than TP's 7660, which shows that in complex patterns, Huawei's signal coverage capability is still stronger than TP.
3. Wi-Fi quality test
After testing the uplink and downlink speeds of the two routers in the two frequency bands, let’s take a look at the performance of the two routers in these three frequency bands. How about the signal strength at different locations? Use the Wi-Fi Evaluation Master APP to test the stability of the router and the overall network quality. The final result is based on the score. A high score indicates excellent network quality.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version versus TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
Let’s first look at point A. You can see that Huawei’s network score is 572 points. TP-Link's network score was 480 points.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version versus TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
Looking at point B again, Huawei scored 563 points and TP-Link scored 468 points .
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version vs. TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
Finally, let’s look at point C. Huawei scored 448 points and TP-Link scored 341 points. The network quality score also once again verified the difference in download speed between the two routers. Compared with open space and short distance, Huawei is still much better, and Huawei's 5200 is also better at slightly longer distances.
By comparison, both routers will have different signal quality and strength as the location and distance change, especially when separated by multiple cement walls and metal doors, the signal will be There is a certain degree of attenuation. Whether in an open, unobstructed environment or in a sheltered place a little further away, Huawei's WS5200 quad-core version is much better than the TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version. And in places with poor signal coverage at longer distances, the performance of the Huawei 5200 is still satisfactory.
Evaluation of Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version compared to TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit version
It is worth mentioning that Huawei’s router also supports game acceleration function. If you are Huawei For mobile phone users, and the mobile phone is EMUI9.0 or above, it is a good choice for friends who love to play games. The built-in acceleration function of the router can solve the problem of network delay and lag when playing games.
4. Summary
After several days of use, I have gained a certain understanding of the two routers. Here is a summary. First of all, Huawei's WS5200 exudes a sense of sophistication both in terms of the router itself and the exclusive APP. The router itself is relatively harmonious and looks good in a home environment. The appearance and management APP of TP-Link TL-WDR7660 look like the work of a man from science and engineering, but the appearance and management software are a bit rough. In terms of performance, the Huawei router WS5200 quad-core version relies on its self-developed Lingxiao dual-core 1GHz processor. It also performs relatively well in extreme test environments, highlighting Huawei's excellent strength in hardware.
Evaluation of Huawei Router WS5200 Quad-Core Version vs. TP-Link TL-WDR7660 Gigabit Version
The performance of both products can meet the needs of general home environments, but If your home is large and there are many room partitions, I personally recommend buying the Huawei WS5200 quad-core version for more peace of mind, as it has good performance in longer-distance signal coverage.