Article 1 In order to improve the scientificity of legislative planning, rationally allocate legislative resources and ensure the quality of legislation, these Measures are formulated in accordance with the Legislative Law of the People's Republic of China, Regulations on Rules-making Procedures of the State Council, Regulations on Rules-making Procedures of Jiangsu Province and other laws, regulations and rules, combined with the actual situation of this Municipality. Article 2 These Measures shall be applicable to the pre-legislative assessment within the administrative area of this Municipality and the declaration of the proposed projects of the regulatory legislative plan to the Municipal People's Government. Article 3 The term "pre-legislative evaluation" as mentioned in these Measures refers to a series of activities, such as analyzing the necessity, feasibility, urgency and legislative cost-effectiveness of the proposed project of the legislative plan according to certain procedures, standards and methods, forming a pre-legislative evaluation report and drafting the proposed draft of the regulations.

encourage the units that declare the proposed projects of regulations and legislative planning to carry out pre-legislative evaluation. Article 4 The pre-legislative evaluation shall follow the principles of public participation, seeking truth from facts, problem-oriented and paying attention to practical results, and the evaluation content shall reflect the requirements of scientificity, systematicness, foresight and innovation. Article 5 The Municipal People's Government shall be responsible for the unified leadership of the pre-legislative evaluation work and provide necessary guarantee for the pre-legislative evaluation work.

the municipal bureau of justice is the competent department of pre-legislative evaluation, and is responsible for organizing, coordinating and guiding the pre-legislative evaluation of regulations. Article 6 The regulatory and legislative plan suggests that the project application unit should be the implementation unit of the pre-legislative evaluation work, which is specifically responsible for the pre-legislative evaluation work, and the funds required for the pre-legislative evaluation work should be included in the departmental budget.

The implementing unit may invite universities, scientific research institutes, professional institutions and social organizations to participate as needed, and may also entrust a third party to carry out pre-legislative evaluation through government procurement services.

Encourage institutions of higher learning, scientific research institutes, professional institutions and social organizations to independently carry out pre-legislative evaluation.

units related to the measures to be taken in the regulations shall provide assistance and support to the pre-legislative evaluation. Article 7 Pre-legislative evaluation includes preparation stage, implementation stage and evaluation report formation stage. Article 8 The preparatory stage of pre-legislative evaluation mainly includes the following tasks:

(1) Establishing a pre-legislative evaluation team. The implementation unit shall set up a pre-legislative evaluation team headed by the principal responsible person of the unit, consisting of the staff of the relevant working institutions of the unit, the staff of the unit related to the measures to be taken by the regulations, experts in related fields and legal workers, and specifically organize the implementation of the pre-legislative evaluation work.

(2) Formulate the pre-legislative evaluation work plan. The pre-legislative evaluation team shall, in accordance with the requirements of these Measures, formulate a pre-legislative evaluation work plan, which mainly includes organizational leadership, evaluation purpose, evaluation content, evaluation method, evaluation steps, time arrangement and funding guarantee. Article 9 The following tasks are mainly carried out in the implementation stage of pre-legislative evaluation:

(1) Issuing the pre-legislative evaluation announcement, including the members of the pre-legislative evaluation team, the evaluation plan and other main contents;

(2) Carry out in-depth investigation and study, and extensively listen to the opinions and suggestions of relevant citizens, legal persons and other organizations;

(3) collect, sort out and analyze the opinions and suggestions heard, and draw a preliminary conclusion. Article 1 Pre-legislative evaluation can be conducted by combining qualitative analysis with quantitative analysis, questionnaire survey, on-the-spot investigation and special investigation. Qualitative analysis of the cited documents should indicate the source, reflecting the problem in line with the current reality; Quantitative analysis strives to quantify, use data to explain the problem, and if necessary, use charts, photos, audio-visual and other forms for auxiliary description. Article 11 The pre-legislative evaluation report mainly includes the following contents:

(1) Basic information;

(2) Analysis of the necessity, feasibility and urgency of legislation;

(3) cost-benefit analysis of legislation;

(4) evaluation conclusion;

(5) Other matters that need to be explained. Article 12 The basic information mainly includes the following contents:

(1) Legislative background, including the actual needs of administrative management in this Municipality, suggestions on legislative work at all levels, and legislative trends in the country, province and other regions;

(2) the development of pre-legislative evaluation, including the procedural work of pre-legislative evaluation and investigation and demonstration;

(3) Other matters that need to be explained. Article 13 The necessity, feasibility and cost-benefit analysis of the pre-legislative evaluation report mainly include the following contents:

(1) Whether the proposed measures meet the requirements of the Constitution, laws and regulations;

(2) whether the measures to be taken meet the requirements of the national reform policy and conform to the market fair competition mechanism;

(3) Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed measures in terms of economic development, public security, social stability and environmental protection;

(4) the adaptability analysis of the measures to be taken and the working organization, staffing, use of funds, law enforcement ability, etc.;

(5) whether the measures to be taken are repetitive or uncoordinated with the existing relevant regulations;

(6) analysis of the effect of the measures to be taken outside the administrative region;

(7) legislative cost analysis, including legislative process cost, law enforcement cost and law-abiding cost analysis;

(8) Other matters that need to be explained.