Implied license means that when the copyright owner can make a statement not to be reproduced or excerpted to prevent others from using the copyrighted work for a fee without consciously doing anything, it is equivalent to implying that others can use the copyrighted work for a fee. , which is called an implied license. What does the implied license of copyright mean? Characteristics of an implied license: 1. Respect the will of the copyright owner. Unlike statutory permission, an implied license respects the will of the copyright owner, and the copyright owner has the right to decide whether to license the work to others. When a work is published, the copyright owner is free to decide whether to exclude others from reprinting, excerpting, etc. of the work through a statement. 2. No express authorization is required to obtain permission. Different from the express permission system, although the copyright owner's will is still the determining factor in whether others can use the copyright owner's works, this will no longer needs to be expressly expressed by the copyright owner, but can be inferred. For example, if the copyright owner of a certain work makes a statement that the work cannot be reproduced, then others will no longer be able to obtain permission to use the work. If the copyright owner does not make such a statement, it is assumed that the user has obtained the copyright owner's permission to use the work. 3. The license is for no specific subject. Unlike an express license, the licensees of a copyright's implicit license are an unspecified majority. As long as the copyright owner's behavior is an act of implicit permission, anyone can use the work without the prior explicit consent of the copyright owner. 4. The copyright owner has the right to receive certain remuneration. Like legal licenses, the use of works is not free. The copyright owner has the right to obtain corresponding remuneration through the use of the work. The copyright owner has material rewards for his labor in creating the work. Relevant legal provisions stipulate that my country's copyright law has not yet established a corresponding implied right licensing system. Article 23 of the Copyright Law stipulates: When textbooks are compiled and published for the purpose of implementing the nine-year compulsory education and the national education plan, unless the author declares in advance that no use is allowed, fragments of published works may be compiled in the textbook without the permission of the copyright owner. Or short literary works, musical works or single-frame works of art or photography, but the remuneration must be paid in accordance with regulations, the name of the author and the title of the work must be specified, and other rights enjoyed by the copyright owner in accordance with this law must not be infringed. The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall apply to restrictions on the rights of publishers, performers, producers of audio and video recordings, radio stations, and television stations. Paragraph 2 of Article 33 stipulates: After the work is published, other newspapers and periodicals may reprint or excerpt it, except where the copyright owner declares that it is not allowed to be reproduced or excerpted, but remuneration must be paid to the copyright owner. In addition, the "Regulations on the Protection of the Right to Disseminate Information Networks" promulgated by the State Council in 2006 and revised in 2013 also have similar provisions. These provisions are generally considered to fall within the scope of statutory permissions, but there are problems such as the mixture of statutory permissions and implied permissions, unclear legislative ideas, and lack of a logical system.