The National Audit Office began to make audit work reports to the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress in 1996. Since 1998, Li Jinhua has served as the Auditor General of the National Audit Office. In the next six years, under the leadership of Li Jinhua, the Audit Office uncovered many major and important cases every year -

●In 1998, it investigated violations of regulations and disciplines in the food system. 2,268 cases were filed, and 1,302 people were punished by party and government disciplines;

●In 1999, the Three Gorges resettlement funds and resettlement town construction funds were audited, and the embezzlement and misappropriation was serious;

●In 2000, 16 were audited In 1999, it was found that 477 million yuan of national debt funds had been misappropriated in each province, municipality and autonomous region. In 2001, an audit of the national debt funds of Guizhou Province revealed that Lu, the former director of the Guizhou Provincial Department of Transportation, Wan Li committed fraud in the bidding for national debt projects, causing a loss of more than 98 million yuan in national construction funds. Lu Wanli has been sentenced to death;

●In 2002, eight branches of China Construction Bank in Guangzhou were found to have made false mortgages of 1 billion yuan; the Agricultural Development Bank of China invested 810 million yuan in the stock market, but the whereabouts of the proceeds are unknown; Results of the 2003 budget execution audit of the Ministry of Personnel

According to the announcement, the main issues discovered during the audit include:

(1) In 2003, the Ministry of Personnel used the balance of government agency funds from previous years and The infrastructure balance of *** totaling 930,000 yuan for the purchase of 1 medium-sized car and 2 small cars was not included in the government procurement budget of the department as required, and was not reported before June 30, 2003. It is not in compliance with the Ministry of Finance's "Regulations on Further Implementation" Notice on Issues Related to the Government Procurement Work of Central Units in 2003 "Central units that should prepare but fail to report government procurement budgets or have omitted to report government procurement projects must make a supplementary report to the Treasury Department of the Ministry of Finance before June 30, 2003. " regulations.

(2) In 2003, the Ministry of Personnel used the infrastructure balance of 4.4893 million yuan from previous years to purchase 16 sets of commercial housing as employee dormitories. This was not included in the 2003 department budget and submitted to the Ministry of Finance for approval, which was not in compliance with the "People's **The Regulations for the Implementation of the State Budget Law stipulates that "the budget expenditures of various departments and units must be implemented in accordance with the budget items and amounts approved by the finance department of the government at the same level."

(3) The postdoctoral funds managed by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under the Ministry of Personnel are project funds with specific purposes.

Results of the 2003 budget execution audit of the Ministry of Railways

The announcement stated that the main problems discovered during the audit include:

(1) In 2003, the Ministry of Railways reported to the Financial The budget amount of railway construction funds approved by the Ministry of Railways for construction projects is 23.88 billion yuan, while the project plan amount reported by the Ministry of Railways to the National Development and Reform Commission is 18.26 billion yuan, causing the budget amount of funds approved by the Ministry of Finance to be 5.62 billion yuan greater than the planned amount of funds. Does not comply with relevant regulations of the Ministry of Finance. At the same time, the above-mentioned Ministry of Finance allocated 23.88 billion yuan to the Ministry of Railways. The Ministry of Railways actually allocated 22.16 billion yuan to its affiliated units that year, and 1.72 billion yuan remained in the Ministry of Railways at the end of the year, which is inconsistent with the "People's Republic of China Budget Law" Regulations on “Expenditures of all levels of government, departments, and units must be implemented in accordance with the budget.”

(2) From 2000 to 2003, the Engineering Management Center of the Ministry of Railways failed to obtain charging permission from relevant national departments, the Engineering Trading Center of the Ministry of Railways failed to obtain independent legal person status in accordance with the law, and *** illegally collected bidding fees and bids. The consulting service fee is 41.49 million yuan, which is used as the management expenses of the two units. It does not comply with the "Notice of the State Planning Commission on Strengthening the Management of Administrative Charges" and the "Strict Implementation of the Charge License System" and the "On the Collection of Railway Engineering Transaction Service Fees by the Engineering Trading Center of the Ministry of Railways" issued by the Ministry of Finance and the State Planning Commission in 2000 "An engineering trading center must obtain legal person status in accordance with regulations before it can charge business services".

(3) From 2000 to 2002, the Engineering Management Center of the Ministry of Railways collected construction project supervision fees of 10.82 million yuan, set up a special account for storage, and was not included in the financial account management.

It does not comply with the Ministry of Finance's "Notice on the Issuance of Construction Project Quality Supervision Fees" that "charge income shall be stored in a special fiscal account and earmarked for special use" and "several provisions on administrative charges and fines and confiscated income to be managed on two lines of revenue and expenditure". It stipulates that "the administrative fees and fines and confiscated income collected by units with the function of collecting and imposing penalties in accordance with national laws, regulations and rules belong to fiscal funds and should be subject to fiscal 'two lines of revenue and expenditure' management".

(4) In August 1995, the Service Center of the Ministry of Railways invested in the establishment of Shanxi Province Jiexiu Luxin Coal Gasification Co., Ltd. (referred to as Luxin Company). By the end of 2002, a cumulative investment of 13.23 million had been made. yuan, accounting for 74.91 shares. In May 2003, the agency service center transferred its shares in Luxin Company to Shanxi Jiexiu Lutong Transportation Co., Ltd. at a price of 9.56 million yuan without asset evaluation and without reporting to the state-owned assets management department for review and approval. According to the "Notice on Strengthening the Supervision and Management of the Transfer of State-owned Property Rights of Enterprises" of the Asset Management Bureau, "To transfer state-owned property rights of enterprises, enterprise assets including land use rights must be uniformly evaluated, and the evaluation work must be entrusted and approved by the state-owned assets management department to obtain qualifications The institution shall be responsible for the transfer and shall be carried out in accordance with the law, and the assessed value must be confirmed by the state-owned assets management department and shall be used as the transfer base price accordingly."

(5) In 2003, the Ministry of Railways used corporate funds such as operation and management fees to subsidize administrative institutions and project expenditures of 112 million yuan, which was not included in the 2003 department budget and was not in compliance with the " The National Budget Law stipulates that "budgetary revenue includes other revenue, and budgetary expenditures include various subsidy expenditures; revenue that must be included in the budget in accordance with regulations must not be concealed or underlisted."

(6) In 2003, in the departmental budget submitted to the Ministry of Finance and approved by the Ministry of Railways, it reported 8.51 million yuan in housing reform funds for the four survey and design institutes that had been transformed into enterprises. These four units In 2002, it has implemented self-funding according to the regulations of the Central Staff Office and is not within the scope of applying for financial appropriations. The above practices are inconsistent with the provisions of the "Budget Law of the People's Republic of China" which stipulates that "departments and units shall not convert funds that should not be spent within the budget into budgetary expenditures."

China Council for the Promotion of International Trade budget execution audit results

According to the audit results, the main issues discovered during the audit include:

(1) Legal Affairs Department In 2003, 6.97 million yuan of certification fee income payable to the central fiscal special account was directly spent; at the end of the year, 7.31 million yuan of deposit interest generated from administrative fees of 160 million yuan and 37.9 million yuan of concluded arbitration income were not turned over to the special fiscal account. The above-mentioned approach is inconsistent with the "Notice forwarded by the General Office of the State Council to the Ministry of Finance on deepening the reform of the two lines of revenue and expenditures and further strengthening financial management opinions", which states that "all departments must report confiscated income, administrative charges and extra-budgetary income in a timely and sufficient manner. The amount shall be paid into the national treasury or the special fiscal account for extra-budgetary funds” and other provisions. In addition, the Legal Affairs Department exceeded the reasonable actual expenditure needs and charged 7.24 million yuan more from the arbitration parties for special remuneration, travel expenses, and accommodation expenses for handling the case.

(2) In 2003, the Council for the Promotion of International Trade failed to break down the project budget of 20.1 million yuan approved by the financial department into specific items. Among them, 16.59 million yuan in career development projects and foreign affairs service expenditure projects were used for Employee benefits amounted to 14.11 million yuan, and employee medical expenses amounted to 2.48 million yuan; the affiliated Legal Affairs Department occupied 10.5 million yuan of certification expenditure project funds, using 5.57 million yuan for personnel funds and 4.93 million yuan for public funds; as the implementation unit of the foreign-related economic and trade arbitration case handling fee project, The Legal Affairs Department misappropriated 8.03 million yuan of project funds in the name of secretary remuneration, auxiliary fees, etc., and used it to issue employee subsidies.

(3) The agency service center transferred 960,000 yuan of miscellaneous income generated from interest, etc. over the years, out of the income and posted it in the temporary deposit account, resulting in false income. It does not comply with the "Notice of the Ministry of Finance on Issuing the Accounting Standards for Public Institutions (Trial)" which stipulates that "accounting should be based on the actual economic business that has occurred, and objectively and truly record and reflect the status and results of various income and expenditures" Regulation.

(4) The Legal Affairs Department *** had 11 bank accounts at the end of 2003, such as opening administrative charge accounts, foreign exchange accounts and RMB accounts used in conjunction with foreign exchange accounts, etc., which is not in compliance with the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Finance. The "Notice on Issuing the Interim Measures for the Management of Bank Accounts of Central Budget Units" issued by the People's Bank of China, the Ministry of Supervision, and the Audit Office stipulates that "central budget units can only open one basic deposit account."

Results of the budget execution audit of the Foreign Languages ??Publishing and Distribution Bureau

Main issues found in the audit:

(1) In 2003, the Foreign Languages ??Publishing and Distribution Bureau should transfer funds to subordinate units The budget fund was 115 million yuan, of which 108 million yuan was actually transferred, and 6.522 million yuan should have been allocated. From 1999 to 2002, the Ministry of Finance allocated 11 million yuan to the Bureau of Foreign Languages ??for revision subsidies and additional publishing loss subsidies for some publications. As of the end of 2003, it was still Not assigned yet. The above-mentioned practices are inconsistent with the provisions of the Budget Law of the People's Republic of China, which stipulates that "expenditures of governments at all levels, departments, and units must be implemented in accordance with the budget."

(2) In 2003, the Ministry of Finance approved 14.46 million yuan of capital construction funds for the Bureau of Foreign Languages ??for the construction of business buildings of the China Internet News Center and the renovation of Building 6 of Huayuan Village, but no expenditure was made that year.

(3) At the end of 2003, the Foreign Language Publishing Administration allocated 2 million yuan of the key book publishing funds used intensively at this level to the Translation Qualification Evaluation Center of the Foreign Publishing Group for the start-up expenses of the center; 86,000 yuan was allocated to "China Today" magazine is used for medical expenses. At the same time, the Foreign Languages ??Publishing Administration allocated 1.746 million yuan to the service center, training center, and editing and research center from the key book publishing funds that were used intensively at this level in previous years to be used for office heating expenses and business expenses. The above *** caused 3.83 million yuan of funds to be changed.

(4) In 1994, the State Planning Commission approved the construction of a staff residential building by the Foreign Languages ??Publishing Administration. The project was completed in 1998. As of the end of 2003, a balance of 3.94 million yuan was still on the account. According to the Ministry of Finance's "Basic "Several Provisions on Construction Financial Management" stipulates that "50% of the surplus funds formed by state investment shall be handed over to the financial department at the same level", and 1.97 million yuan should be paid to the finance department.

Measures taken after the audit storm

The 25 directors of the National Audit Office rotated to various ministries and commissions to conduct cross-audits

Provincial and ministerial-level senior officials’ economic responsibility audit pilot project

p>

Proposed audit results announcement system

The National Audit Office has entered the nine major state-owned enterprises and a new round of audit plans have been fully activated

The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection intervenes in the "audit storm" to strengthen the anti-corruption struggle here In this audit report on the implementation of the central budget and other fiscal revenue and expenditures in 2003, the main problems and some cases existing in the central budget management, central capital construction budget management and budget implementation of other central departments are vividly recorded:

——In 1994, the former State Planning Commission approved the joint construction of a scientific research office building by seven units including the affiliated Macroeconomic Research Institute. After the office building was completed, the former State Planning Commission used part of the area for rent from 2001 to 2003* **Collected rent of 32.85 million yuan to use for overexpenditure of medical expenses for retired government officials. The National Development and Reform Commission should clean up the rental properties and report them to the State Administration for study and handling.

——The State Forestry Administration’s Investigation, Planning and Design Institute and four other units fabricated and altered 7 loan contracts for the “Forestry Desertification Control Project” and obtained 4.15 million yuan in fiscal discount funds.

——Since 1999, the State Sports General Administration has used 131 million yuan of special funds from the Chinese Olympic Committee, of which 109 million yuan has been used to build employee residential quarters and to distribute salary to the general administration staff. Subsidy and lend 22.04 million yuan to subordinate units to invest in enterprises.

——In 2003, the Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense allocated 16.21 billion yuan in budget funds, and reserved 6.291 billion yuan at the beginning of the year, with a reservation ratio of 38.8; the Ministry of Science and Technology allocated 16.21 billion yuan in budget funds at the beginning of the year. When budgeting funds, all 1.701 billion yuan of the three science and technology expenses were reserved. It was not until August to November of that year that additional approval was given to relevant localities and departments.

According to the audit, some infrastructure construction such as the Yangtze River Embankment Hidden Project has hidden dangers and low efficiency problems. A number of matters related to the chaotic management and use of special funds and infringement of the vital interests of the people have also "surfaced":

——During the construction of the Yangtze River Embankment Hidden Project, some construction units bribed the construction and supervision units, cheated, cut corners and materials, threw less riprap and more stones for the underwater bank protection, and used thinner and thicker stones for the above-water slope protection. The quality of the project is worrying. A random inspection of 5 bid sections revealed that the amount of underwater rock dumping was falsely reported at 165,400 cubic meters, resulting in an overpayment of more than 10 million yuan for the project. The low-water platform of some embankment sections had collapsed; a spot check of 11 key dangerous sections found that the amount of underwater rock rippling was 165,400 cubic meters. There are more than 50 unqualified bidding sections for the block stone slope protection project. In the construction and management of this project, the relevant responsible persons abused their power for personal gain and accepted bribes wantonly. After the case was reported to the State Council, relevant departments opened a case for investigation and arrested 21 people. (Editor in charge: Zhou Genghu)

——The Henan Province Coal Gasification Project, a national key construction project with an investment of 2.279 billion yuan, took 16 years from project establishment to completion and commissioning in 2001. During this period, the supply and demand of the gas market underwent major changes. , but the project decision-makers and construction units still insisted on carrying out the construction according to the original plan. As a result, the project could only operate at half of the designed gas supply capacity after completion. The operation was in serious difficulties, with a loss of more than 200 million yuan in 2002 alone.

——Hubei Province Huanggang Municipal Government and relevant departments committed fraud, misappropriated 11.67 million yuan of national debt funds for the Pearl Avenue project, occupied 110 acres of housing project land, and built the "image project" Oriental Plaza, seriously affecting the Pearl Avenue of construction.

——927 acres of collective mountain forest land in Hongshan District, Wuhan City, was illegally bought and sold four times, with relevant units and individuals making more than 40 million yuan in profits.

——In December 2003, the Service Center of the State Food and Drug Administration signed an agreement with two companies, allocating 216 acres of land in Changping District, Beijing, to the State Food and Drug Administration without compensation for 85 million yuan. The price of RMB 10,000 was transferred to these two companies for business development. After the audit, the bureau attached great importance to it and was studying corrections.

——In April 2001, when the private enterprise Huahai Company learned that the Wuhan Municipal Government was planning to expropriate 805 acres of land in two villages in Houhu Township, Jianghan District, it was recommended by the relevant leaders of the township. For any approval procedures, a joint land development contract was signed with the two villages respectively. The "special" stipulation is that if the country requisitions the land, Huahai Company guarantees that the compensation to the two villages will not be less than 108,000 yuan and 12.5 yuan per mu of land. If the national land acquisition compensation is higher than the above price, 80 or all of the excess will belong to Huahai Company. In August of the same year, Wuhan City expropriated the above-mentioned land at prices of 148,000 yuan and 147,000 yuan per mu, and Huahai Company pocketed the difference of 18.01 million yuan. Two days after receiving the last tranche of funds, Huahai Company applied to the industrial and commercial department to cancel the company. The private business owner is at large.

——Among the 14 disaster-stricken counties in Anhui, Henan, and Jiangsu in the Huaihe River Basin, 9 counties used methods such as re-reporting or over-reporting the number of resettled households to obtain housing construction subsidies for people in the disaster areas 1. 3.6 billion yuan. Huoqiu County in Anhui Province lowered the subsidy standards from its superiors and deducted 3.6 million yuan in housing construction funds from 1,804 households in the disaster area.

——The 2003 Yunnan Dayao earthquake relief funds are being managed and used. As of March 2004, of the 120 million yuan in special natural disaster relief subsidies allocated by the central government, there are still 51.74 million yuan. Remaining in county-level finance; relevant departments misappropriated 41.11 million yuan of disaster relief funds, which were mainly used to balance the budget, build halls and halls, and entertain expenses.

When auditing the assets, liabilities, profits and losses of financial institutions such as Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, the former China Life Insurance Company and Bank of Communications, new financial risk issues were discovered in aspects such as personal consumer credit.

——Audited the assets, liabilities, profits and losses of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China head office and 21 branches. The main problems found were: illegal granting of loans, and illegal handling of bill acceptance and discounting. At the same time, clues to 30 cases of various types were discovered, involving a total amount of 6.9 billion yuan.

(Editor: Zhou Genghu)

——The Shanghai Waigaoqiao Free Trade Zone Branch of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China issued a personal housing loan of 71.41 million yuan to "Yao Kangda" alone. These funds were used to purchase 128 houses and speculate on real estate.

——The audit randomly inspected the 791 million yuan automobile consumer loan handled by the Beijing Cuiwei Road Branch of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and found that four car dealers used false information to defraud the loans amounting to 96.5 million yuan.

——The management of the bill market is chaotic. Henan Luoyang Fenlai Trading Co., Ltd. colluded internally and externally with bank staff to "package" bank acceptance bills worth RMB 492 million in 2002 for Dalian Shide Plastic Industry Company and its affiliates. Since 2001, the company has collected 2.16 million yuan in benefit fees through such "business" ***.

——The problem of loan fraud by private affiliated enterprises is prominent. Feng, a private enterprise owner in Foshan, Guangdong Province, used 13 affiliated companies he controlled to fabricate false financial statements, colluded with bank insiders, and obtained a total of 7.421 billion yuan in loans from the Nanhai Branch of ICBC, with a balance of 19.29 billion yuan as of the time of the audit. billion. A large number of these loans were transferred into personal savings accounts or cash was withdrawn directly, and some were even remitted abroad through illegal channels. After preliminary verification, bank loan losses have exceeded 1 billion yuan. After the audit found out, the Ministry of Supervision and others are organizing forces to conduct an in-depth investigation.

——The original China Life Insurance Company was involved in unfair competition issues such as unauthorized changes in insurance rates, excessive surrenders, and illegal agency insurance business, amounting to RMB 2.374 billion; illegal lending, investment, and office construction of insurance funds The audit also found 28 clues to various cases involving a total amount of 489 million yuan. These problems occurred before the restructuring of China Life Insurance Company. After the audit, the life insurance company took it very seriously and immediately carried out comprehensive rectifications, and the problems are being gradually corrected.

——From 2000 to 2002, the Jinzhou Branch of the Bank of Communications worked with the Jinzhou Intermediate Court, Guta District and Linghe District Courts to make forged legal documents and reported them to the Bank of Communications Head Office to write off 175 companies. “Non-performing” loans amounted to 221 million yuan. The companies whose loans had been written off were not aware of it at all, and some of them continued to repay the loans. The repaid loan principal and the proceeds from the realization of the mortgaged assets were all deposited into the "small treasury" by the bank. At the same time, the court collected "litigation fees" from the above-mentioned false lawsuits, of which Jinzhou Intermediate People's Court and Linghe District Court deposited 853,000 yuan collected into private accounts. The audit agency transferred the case to relevant departments for investigation and handling. Seven people have been investigated and one person has been arrested. On September 19, 2007, the National Audit Office issued an audit announcement on the 2006 budget implementation of 49 central departments. Compared with the more than 10,000-word audit report submitted by Auditor General Li Jinhua to the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress at the end of June, today it is nearly 100,000 words. The announcement disclosed to the public in more detail how much problematic funds 49 central government departments and their affiliated departments have.

The phenomenon of relying on the power of central departments to charge fees is quite prominent

Li Jinhua said in the audit report, “12 departments have problems with illegal charging or failure to strictly implement non-tax revenue management regulations, involving amounts of 185 million yuan.” Today’s announcement restores the fact that these departments charged illegally.

In 2005 and 2006, the National Development and Reform Commission collected 13.4 million yuan in sponsorship fees from enterprises by organizing large-scale conferences, exhibitions, etc. The largest amount was to prepare the original fund of the Western China Talent Development Foundation. China Petrochemical Corporation charges a sponsorship fee of 5 million yuan; in the absence of approval of the charging standards, the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce charges a "special mark registration" fee of 285,000 yuan.

There are also agencies directly under some departments that are also using their inextricable connections with government departments to charge illegal fees. For example, the China Green Food Development Center under the Ministry of Agriculture illegally charged 39.5393 million yuan.

From 2000 to 2006, the National Continuing Medical Education Committee, Hospital Management Research Institute and other units affiliated to the Ministry of Education collected 37.5415 million yuan in certificate production fees without approval from the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Finance.

The Hospital Management Research Institute of the Ministry of Health and other units handed over education and training projects to other units. In 2006, *** collected 838,400 yuan in management fees and cooperation fees.

From 1997 to 2006, the General Administration of Civil Aviation and the Civil Aviation Management Cadre College independently established 9 institutions, including the China Civil Aviation Safety College, the Civil Aviation Enterprise Management Research Base, and the China Civil Aviation Flight Standards Training Center, which were affiliated with the Civil Aviation Management Cadre College. . After random inspection, it was found that in 2006, the China Civil Aviation Flight Standards Training Center obtained training income of 1.3251 million yuan without approval.

From 2003 to 2006, the Beijing Capital International Airport Public Security Bureau voluntarily collected 2.666 million yuan in certificate fees for the isolation area of ??the Capital Airport terminal; from 2002 to 2006, the traffic inspection detachment of the branch illegally charged the aviation activity area Driving license and civil aviation vehicle license fees are 2.3008 million yuan.

The China Academy of Work Safety, a subsidiary of the State Administration of Work Safety, charges 2.4056 million yuan for unapproved independent projects.

Li Jinhua once emphasized in the audit report that some units affiliated to central departments rely on departmental power to charge fees. A random check on the charging situation of 138 units affiliated to 26 departments found that 5 departments had transferred and dispersed the charging rights to lower-level units, involving 484 million yuan in fees. In 2005 and 2006 alone, these units benefited 115 million yuan. 28 units affiliated or managed by 12 departments rely on the power, influence and public resources of the department to collect fees, involving 45 charging items. In 2006 alone, the fees reached 337 million yuan, an increase of 10.8% over the previous year. .

The survey shows that fees have become the most important source of funds for some departments and units, and some even rely on fees to survive. The management of fee funds in some units is relatively chaotic.

There is a problem with the money for wages, benefits, and insurance.

How do the high wages and benefits of some powerful departments come from? The audit report replied that several departments used methods such as concealing income, falsely listing expenditures, and misappropriating special funds to issue employee bonuses and benefits.

Today’s audit announcement disclosed those departments that illegally paid wages and benefits: from 2003 to 2006, the Chinese Academy of Engineering withdrew 3.8727 million yuan in management fees for major consulting projects allocated by the government, which were used for employees and retirees. Staff salary expenses.

In 2006, the Nanjing Branch of the People's Bank of China and its three affiliated branches disbursed 17.3577 million yuan in subsidies and bonuses to in-service personnel in postal and telecommunications expenses, travel expenses and other subjects; the branch itself included in office expenses , issued job responsibility awards worth 3.9268 million yuan.

From 2003 to 2005, the Animal Products Center of the Ministry of Agriculture allocated 1.865 million yuan in project funds such as "safety monitoring funds for pollution-free agricultural products" in the name of allocating veterinary drug withdrawal period test fees and sampling inspection fees. Transferred to the Beijing Guonong Industry and Trade Development Center, which is affiliated to the National Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Station. As of the end of 2006, all the above-mentioned funds were used for basic expenses such as personnel salaries and travel expenses of the Animal Products Center and the Beijing National Agricultural Industry and Trade Development Center.

From 2005 to 2006, the Animal Husbandry Product Certification Sub-Center of the Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Center of the Ministry of Agriculture and other units were involved in "pollution-free agricultural product quality certification", "animal epidemic monitoring and prevention", "agricultural information services", etc. Among the administrative projects, 3.4513 million yuan of personnel funds and public funds are listed.

The Research Center of the State Administration of Work Safety used false vouchers to obtain 7.0088 million yuan in cash, part of which was used to issue employee bonuses and subsidies.

From April 2005 to the end of 2006, the trade union of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs paid a total of 5.8985 million yuan in employee welfare fees and trade union activity fees to the trade unions of various departments and bureaus at the standard of 50 yuan per person per month. Yuan.

The China Rural Technology Development Center of the Ministry of Science and Technology listed a total of 1.6445 million yuan in employee bonuses and holiday subsidies as part of the research project expenditures.

In November 1997, the First Research Institute of the Ministry of Public Security applied for supplementary pension insurance for retired employees and current employees.

As of the end of 2006, the institute had paid a total of RMB 55.3701 million in premiums from the "Special Fund - Employee Welfare Fund", of which RMB 1.4701 million was spent in 2006.

In 2006, the State Administration of Taxation listed 3.609 million yuan in public funds as "spiritual civilization rewards" for the personnel of the State Administration and medical expenses for agency employees and their families.

The trend of competition in building construction has not stopped

For some time, central departments and their affiliated agencies have been competing in building office buildings. The audit report said that the Civil Aviation Administration of China Five units affiliated to four departments including the Ministry of Information Industry and the Ministry of Information Industry had issues such as building office buildings and training centers without approval, exceeding standards, and exceeding estimates, involving an amount of 1.739 billion yuan.

In 2005, the Fujian Provincial Communications Administration Bureau applied to the Ministry of Information Industry to build a "comprehensive office building with a construction area of ??9,400 square meters and an investment of 49.3 million yuan" when it already had an office building with a construction area of ??6,650.8 square meters. "Business Building". After receiving approval, in February 2006 it was decided to increase the construction area to 15,000 square meters and the total cost to 77.99 million yuan.

In 2004, the Communications Administration Bureau of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region applied to the Autonomous Region Development and Reform Commission for an office building with a construction area of ??10,000 square meters and a total investment of 28 million yuan when it already had an office building with a construction area of ??4,058.91 square meters. Office building construction project, approved. In March 2006, the bureau adjusted its construction area to 6,000 square meters.

The Xi’an Branch of the People’s Bank of China misappropriated 85.9842 million yuan in office building construction funds. As of the end of 2006, the Xi'an Branch of the People's Bank of China had a balance of 120 million yuan in office building construction funds allocated by the People's Bank of China Head Office, of which 78.04 million yuan was misappropriated by the branch to build employee residential buildings, and 7.9442 million yuan was used to provide residential building decoration subsidies to employees. .

In 2006, the Ministry of Land and Resources implemented a greening project in the eastern section of the ministry compound without approval. As of the time of the audit, the balance of previous years had been used to pay for the project of 1.4 million yuan, and the project had not yet been settled. During the implementation of the project, there were problems such as artificially shortening the submission time of bidding documents, the construction unit participating in the bid evaluation and the bid evaluation personnel had no professional qualifications, and the project payment paid exceeded the winning bid price of 260,000 yuan.

In addition to building buildings that exceed the standard, there are also some units that exceed the standard for meetings and buy cars that exceed the standard. From 2005 to 2006, the actual per capita expenditure for 49 meetings held by the South-to-North Water Diversion Office exceeded the prescribed expenditure standards. For example, in the "South-to-North Water Diversion Work Coordination Meeting" held by the South-to-North Water Diversion Office in Beijing in July 2005, the per capita room and meal expenses were 598 yuan. /sky.

Lack of strict investment leads to losses of state-owned assets

50 units affiliated to 13 departments including the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Ministry of Water Resources have lax management of external investment, irregular restructuring, and undercounting of state-owned assets and equity etc., involving an amount of 2.284 billion yuan.

Among them, 39 units affiliated to 5 departments undercounted state-owned assets and equity by 2.012 billion yuan during the process of restructuring and foreign investment; 7 units affiliated to 4 departments lent funds and made foreign investments, resulting in state-owned Asset losses or potential losses amounted to RMB 229 million; five units affiliated to five departments disposed of, wrote off, or sold state-owned assets at low prices for RMB 43,005,000 without authorization.

For example, in 2000, with the approval of the China Association for Science and Technology, the affiliated China Science and Technology Hall (enterprise) transferred 5.3 million yuan from the special funds for renovation and transformation allocated by the China Association for Science and Technology to supplement the China Association for Science and Technology’s support. Investment from Shanghai Zhongda Industrial Investment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Shanghai Zhongda Company); as of the end of 2006, other receivables of the China Association for Science and Technology reflected loans of 13.342 million yuan receivable from Shanghai Zhongda Company in previous years. The China Association for Science and Technology has confirmed that the above-mentioned investment and loans to Shanghai Zhongda Company totaling 18.642 million yuan cannot be recovered, resulting in losses.

CCTV’s 130 million yuan investment in Bei Putuo Film and Television Training Base Co., Ltd. has not yielded investment returns for a long time.

From May 1994 to August 1996, CCTV *** invested 77.6 million yuan in Bei Putuo Film and Television Training Base Co., Ltd. In 2003, it replaced Bei Putuo with the station's 55.7254 million yuan deposit in a trust investment company. Film and Television Training Base Co., Ltd. has an equity of 70.2142 million yuan. CCTV should own 148 million yuan of equity in Beiputuo Company, but it has not received any income from this investment for more than ten years.

In addition,

·The High Court misappropriated 10.64 million yuan of special business funds in 2006

·The National Development and Reform Commission collected 13.4 million yuan in sponsorship fees from enterprises in 2006

·In 2006, 157 million yuan was not reviewed and filed by the Ministry of Finance as required

·The audit results of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission in 2006: 51.9032 million yuan of project funds were diverted

·In 2006, the China Securities Regulatory Commission Violated expenditure of 18.0501 million yuan