Chanel brand was sued by Guizhou Wushu Branch of Chinese Wushu Association for the simple reason that it is the trademark of Chanel, which is similar to China's traditional weapon Bagua Woods Yuanyang Yue, and is regarded as disrespectful to China culture. Plagiarism is not plagiarism, so it is difficult to judge objectively. It is understandable to say that they don't copy, and they can't play together. Plagiarism, trademarks and weapons are almost identical and can be recognized.

Of course, this is not only a problem of plagiarism, but also a conflict between Chanel and China. The trademark case dates back to 20 17, and Chanel touched Huawei for no reason. Chanel sued three times in a row under the condition that the trademarks were not similar and the types were completely different, and finally lost. Now Guizhou Branch, as Ren's hometown, the prosecution can be regarded as a counterattack. But what is more interesting is that this branch has not been recognized by the Wushu Association and Guizhou, and it is fake.

1, Chanel Touching Porcelain Huawei Chanel sued Huawei Smart Life on 20 17 on the grounds that their LOGO are very similar. Speaking of which, if you look carefully, Chanel's LOGO is just the cross of two capital letters C, while Huawei's is more like an anti-needle, and the two are almost irrelevant. In the process of the dispute between the two sides, the court finally found that Chanel deliberately touched porcelain. Later, Chanel was not convinced and sued twice in a row, eventually losing the case.

This vigorous Chanel porcelain-touching war finally ended in the first half of 20021. However, the end of one battle is the beginning of another. The LOGO war has begun again.

2. Guizhou Wushu Association and Chanel Chinese Wushu Association Guizhou Branch sued Chanel in court. The reason is that Chanel's logo is copied from China's traditional weapon, Mandarin Duck. People who are familiar with countless people should know that this is a weapon created by Dong Haichuan, a martial arts master in the Qing Dynasty.

Weapons and trademarks are things you can't see at a glance, but they are really similar. It can be said that Chanel's logo is to design Yuanyang. Highly similar, the Wushu Association requires the other party to pay various expenses of more than 30 million yuan.

3. The reversal of things lies in the statement of the Chinese Wushu Association and Guizhou, in which they said that there was no such branch. In other words, it is just a fake and shoddy institution on the Internet. Considering that anyone is from Guizhou, the purpose of this association should be to export natural gas and earn some money by the way.

After so many years, it is difficult to judge plagiarism. Especially weapons have little to do with LOGO. In addition, no matter whether you win or lose, money should not be given to so-called fake associations.