Is the preemptive registration of cultural relic trademarks legal? my country’s Trademark Law stipulates that if a natural person, legal person or other organization needs to obtain the exclusive right to trademark for the goods it produces, manufactures, processes, selects or distributes, it shall apply to the Trademark Office Trademark registration, a trademark approved by the Trademark Office is a registered trademark, and the trademark registrant enjoys exclusive rights. It can be seen that in our country, only the exclusive right to use a trademark must be approved and registered by the Trademark Office, and the law only protects the exclusive right to registered trademarks. Our country adopts the principle of voluntary registration in the trademark registration system, with the exception of compulsory registration of trademarks. Operators are completely free to decide whether to use trademarks and apply for trademark registration for the goods or services they provide, and no one has the right to interfere. Likewise, there is no moral or legal obligation for anyone to apply for trademark registration to protect their interests. It is up to the trademark user to decide whether to apply for registration of a trademark. On April 29, 1985, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce and other four ministries and commissions pointed out in the "Notice on Several Opinions on the Use of Unregistered Trademarks" that the use of unregistered trademarks in accordance with the law does not violate the voluntary principle of trademark registration, and the use of unregistered trademarks should be allowed. Production, sales, export of goods and participation in the evaluation of high-quality products. Our country allows the use of unregistered trademarks. Although the use of unregistered trademarks brings certain benefits to the user, such use is a de facto and natural law right and cannot generate exclusive rights. Compared with registered trademark rights, unregistered trademark rights have the characteristics of naturalness, convenience, usability, and variability. Naturalness means that as long as the right holder designs a trademark by himself or hires others to design it, he can naturally obtain ownership of the trademark without completing any other procedures. Convenience means that right holders can freely dispose of their trademark rights, whether it is licensing, pledge, investment or transfer, without having to perform registration procedures with the relevant competent authorities. Volatility means that the rights holder can make any modifications to his trademark at any time, provided that it does not violate legal provisions and does not infringe the trademark rights of others. Trial nature reflects a situation where the right holder is not sure whether a newly designed trademark will be welcomed by consumers after it is put on the market, and has the attitude of giving it a try. If the goods marked with the trademark are sold If you are optimistic, you can increase your investment. On the contrary, reduce investment or even completely abandon the trademark. The preemptive registration of cultural relics trademarks is legal as long as it is carried out in accordance with the relevant laws. However, in reality, how many people are willing to carry out complicated procedures to reduce the damage to their own interests? However, there are certain limitations when doing preemptive registration. You need to have a certain understanding, because it involves intellectual property issues, so you have to pay attention to it.