my country's trademark review is very strict, so the requirements for being a member of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board are also very high. All trademarks submitted for application need to pass the review of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board. The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board is affiliated to the State Administration for Industry and Commerce and is an independent organization parallel to the Trademark Office. It is composed of a chairman, deputy directors, and members appointed by the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, among whom there are 15 to 17 members.

Members of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Committee shall meet the following conditions: be familiar with trademark laws; have been engaged in trademark review work for at least three years or engaged in other legal affairs for at least five years; and be civil servants of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce. The duties and powers of the chairman of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board are: to preside over the daily work of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board; to decide on the recusal of members of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board; to review and issue trademark review and adjudication letters. The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board sets up an expert advisory group to solicit opinions on relevant matters in trademark review matters. The expert advisory group is composed of several legal experts in the intellectual property field, and its members are appointed by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board. The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board has an office responsible for daily work. The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board handles trademark review matters, adopts a member voting system, and follows the principle of the minority obeying the majority.

The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board has the right to make a ruling to confirm or revoke the exclusive right to use a trademark based on the party's application. Ruling is a collective term for rulings and decisions. The former is a way to handle trademark disputes between the applicant and the respondent, who are legally on equal footing; the latter is a way to handle trademark disputes when the parties are dissatisfied with the Trademark Office's decision that the use of the trademark violates legal provisions, the trademark registration is improper, or there are other violations of the law. How to handle trademark review matters based on the decision on the requested behavior, etc.

If you have any questions about intellectual property-related issues, you are welcome to log in for consultation, and professional customer service will answer you one-on-one. Trademark Rejection Application Trademark Rejection Review