The details of the rejection response rate are as follows:

1. Timing of trademark rejection review application: The trademark is rejected based on absolute reasons, such as violation of the provisions of the Trademark Law, then the success of the review The rate is relatively low because these reasons are clear in the trademark law and cannot be changed through review. If a trademark is rejected based on relative reasons, such as similarity to an earlier trademark, the success rate of reexamination is relatively high because these reasons can be argued by providing evidence.

2. Evidence provided: When conducting a trademark rejection review, sufficient evidence needs to be provided to prove the use and popularity of the trademark. If the evidence is sufficient and can prove that the trademark has a long history of use, a wide range, and a high reputation, the chances of a successful reexamination will increase.

3. The examiner’s subjective judgment: The examiner’s subjective judgment will also affect the success rate of reexamination. If the examiner's understanding of the trademark is biased or subjective, the chances of a successful reexamination may be reduced. However, if the examiner can examine the trademark objectively and impartially, the chances of a successful review will increase.

4. Trademark regulations: Trademark regulations will also affect the success rate of reexamination. Regulations clearly stipulate that trademarks can be rejected or not registered under certain circumstances, so the success rate of reexamination in these cases will be lower.