Yes, it is likely to constitute infringement, which belongs to the actor's use of the same or similar trademark on the same or similar goods without the permission of the trademark owner, or other acts that interfere with or hinder the trademark owner from using his registered trademark and damage the legitimate rights and interests of the trademark owner. The infringer usually has to bear the responsibility of stopping the infringement, and the actor who knows or should know that it is an infringement has to bear the responsibility of compensation. If the circumstances are serious, they shall also bear criminal responsibility. Article 57 of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China commits any of the following acts, which are all violations of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark: (1) Using the same trademark as its registered trademark on the same commodity without the permission of the trademark registrant; ? (2) Without the permission of the trademark registrant, using a trademark similar to its registered trademark on the same commodity, or using a trademark identical to or similar to its registered trademark on similar commodities is likely to lead to confusion; ? (3) selling goods that infringe upon the exclusive right to use a registered trademark; ? (4) Forging or unauthorized manufacturing of registered trademark marks of others or selling forged or unauthorized registered trademark marks; ? (five) without the consent of the trademark registrant, the registered trademark is changed and the goods with the changed trademark are put on the market again; ? (6) Deliberately providing convenience for the infringement of the exclusive right to use a trademark of others and helping others to commit the infringement of the exclusive right to use a trademark; ? (seven) causing other damage to the exclusive right to use a registered trademark of others.