The following reasons are not involved in infringement:

1. Some of them have the source indicated.

2. Some only provide materials for the work.

3. There is no accountability requirement for these stolen original videos.

4. These stolen and republished works are not commercial and do not essentially damage the rights and interests of the original author. Instead, they play a certain publicity role and are also beneficial to the cited party.

Films and television dramas are generally copyrighted, so when using the content of the film and television dramas, you must obtain the consent of the copyright holder of the film and television dramas before using it. There are some movies and TV dramas on the Douyin platform that have been authorized by the copyright owners, allowing users of the Douyin platform to use them on the Douyin platform, so even if users use them, they will not infringe on the rights of the copyright owners of the movie and TV dramas.

However, if the Douyin platform does not obtain the permission of the copyright holder for film and television dramas or the film and television drama materials obtained by users through other channels, if the content of the work is edited, adapted, or changed without the permission of the copyright holder, this constitutes Infringement, if you do not want to infringe, you need to obtain authorization from the copyright owner before using it.

In the following circumstances, the people's court may preliminarily determine that the defendant has the intention to infringe intellectual property rights:

(1) The defendant continues to commit infringement after being notified or warned by the plaintiff or interested party Behavioral.

(2) The defendant or its legal representative or manager is the legal representative, manager or actual controller of the plaintiff or interested party.

(3) The defendant has labor, labor, cooperation, licensing, distribution, agency, representative, etc. relationships with the plaintiff or interested parties, and has had contact with the infringed intellectual property rights.

(4) The defendant has business dealings with the plaintiff or interested parties or has negotiated for the conclusion of a contract, and has had contact with the infringed intellectual property rights.

(5) The defendant committed piracy and counterfeiting of registered trademarks.

(6) Other circumstances that can be determined as intentional. Article 4 To determine the seriousness of intellectual property infringement, the People's Court shall comprehensively consider factors such as the means and frequency of infringement, the duration, geographical scope, scale, and consequences of the infringement, the infringer's behavior in the litigation, and other factors.

If the defendant has the following circumstances, the people's court may determine the circumstances to be serious:

(1) After being administratively punished for infringement or being held liable by a court ruling, the defendant commits the same or similar infringement again .

(2) Making a career out of infringing on intellectual property rights.

(3) Forging, destroying or concealing infringement evidence.

(4) Refusing to perform the preservation order.

(5) The infringement has resulted in huge profits or the rights holder has suffered huge losses.

(6) Infringement may endanger national security, public interests or personal health.

(7) Other circumstances that can be considered serious.