Legal analysis: The first kind is a non-court summons, but other subjects inform the infringement by mail or other forms. In this case, most of them belong to fraud or vicious competition (of course, there may be real infringement). At this time, it is necessary to first identify whether the other party owns the trademark category. If not, it can be ignored. If there is infringement and the other party fails to go through the court, it is mostly for private purposes, and enterprises only need to negotiate patiently.

The second is a court summons. In this case, the prosecution finds that you are infringing, which has caused more or less negative effects to the other party.

Legal basis: Article 64 of the Trademark Law of People's Republic of China (PRC). If the owner of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark cannot prove that he has actually used the registered trademark in the previous three years, nor can he prove that he has suffered other losses due to infringement, the accused infringer shall not be liable for compensation.