First of all, the procedure of revoking a trademark for three consecutive years can be put forward by anyone. The essence of the procedure of revoking the trademark is to avoid the trademark being idle and occupying resources.

Secondly, whether the trademark has been revoked or maintained valid, the burden of proof for the use of the trademark lies with the respondent (that is, the trademark owner). After anyone applies for revocation, the Trademark Office will issue a notice to the respondent to submit the evidence for the use of the trademark, and the trademark owner needs to submit the evidence;

the evidence of trademark use must be authentic, relevant and legal; Specific to the physical object: sales agreement, invoice, delivery list, advertising promotion agreement and invoice (if there is an advertisement), advertising production time, etc.

finally, the previous individual answers, especially the one who submitted the evidence himself and then revoked the trademark of the respondent. I want to say that it is not because you provided the evidence, but because the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board did not recognize the evidence submitted by the respondent.

At present, if the trademark revocation case has not been revoked at the Trademark Office stage, you can try to review the revocation at the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board stage; If the evidence submitted by the respondent in the withdrawal stage is not visible to the applicant, the evidence submitted by the other party in the withdrawal review stage will be sent to the applicant, and the applicant can conduct cross-examination to refute the evidence one by one; A lot of cases were overturned in the revocation review stage of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board!