On June 21st, 211, a netizen named "Guo Meimei baby" on Sina Weibo claimed to be a 2-year-old girl who lived in a big villa and drove a Maserati, and her authentication status was "Commercial General Manager of China Red Cross Society". According to the police investigation and Guo Meimei's own confession, she and her source of funds have nothing to do with the China Red Cross. The China Red Cross Society does not have a "Red Cross Chamber of Commerce", nor does it have the position of "General Manager of Commerce", and there is no such person as Guo Meimei. Basic introduction Chinese name: microblogging show off their wealth event mbth: microblogging show off their wealth event ID: Guo Meimei baby name: Guo Meimei event review, responses from all parties, Red Cross Society, Sina Weibo, Guo Meiling himself, supervision committee, Zhonghong Boai, police notification, mother-daughter interview, event impact, general notification, similar events, introduction, investigation, event review Guo Meiling, Weibo nicknamed "Guo Meimei baby". On June 2th, 211, Guo Meiling showed off his luxurious life on the Internet, calling himself the commercial general manager of China Red Cross Society, which caused a sensation on the Internet. On June 22nd, 211, China Red Cross Society claimed that "Guo Meimei" had nothing to do with the Red Cross Society. The China Red Cross Society did not have a "Red Cross Chamber of Commerce", nor did it have the position of "General Manager of Commerce", let alone "Guo Meimei". On June 22, 211, Sina Weibo also apologized for the wrong real-name authentication, and cancelled Guo Meimei's authentication (adding "V"). At about 12 noon, Weibo's little secretary (Sina Weibo official account) issued a message saying that she apologized for the negative impact caused by the lax examination in the process of Sina Weibo's authentication, and apologized for adding "V" to Guo Meimei's authentication, saying that the examination of identity authentication was lax. On June 22, 211, Guo Meiling publicly stated in his Sina Weibo that "1. I have nothing to do with the Red Cross Society; I am not the president of the Red Cross or the descendant of Mr. Guo Moruo. I was certified as an actor by Sina at that time. The Red Cross Chamber of Commerce I mentioned is not the name of the company or organization. 5. I don't want to explain too much about others, and the public opinion and rumors are terrible ... "On August 7, 214, according to the police investigation and Guo Meimei's own confession, she and her source of funds have nothing to do with the China Red Cross. In response to the Red Cross Society's flaunting of wealth against Sina Weibo netizen "@ Guo Meimei baby", the China Red Cross issued a statement on the official website. The following is the full text of the statement: A netizen named "Guo Meimei baby" claimed to be the "general manager of China Red Cross Business" and showed off his luxurious lifestyle on the Internet, which triggered hot discussion and even speculation among netizens. After investigating and verifying the relevant information, I will make the following explanations: 1. The China Red Cross Society does not have a "Red Cross Chamber of Commerce", nor does it have the position of "General Manager of Commerce", and there is no such person as Guo Meimei. Second, in order to maintain the seriousness of the Red Cross sign, China's Law on the Red Cross Society of the People's Republic of China, the Trademark Law and related laws and regulations strictly restrict third parties from using the sign and name of the Red Cross without permission. I will reserve the right to further investigate the relevant responsibilities of relevant parties. Third, I will always oppose those behaviors that attempt to hype individuals by creating false information, and I hope that all sectors of society will treat such problems with a peaceful attitude and will not be used. Finally, I thank all sectors of society for their long-term support to the Red Cross cause and hope to continue to supervise the work of the Red Cross. On June 22nd, 211, Sina Weibo, China Red Cross Society, found that user Guo Meimei's baby was originally certified as an actor, but after my application, the certification description was changed to' General Manager of Red Cross Business'. During this process, Sina Weibo did not conduct strict audit. Sina Weibo deeply apologizes to the Red Cross, relevant personnel and users of Sina Weibo. In the future, the certification process will be strictly regulated, and everyone is welcome to supervise. Guo Meiling himself 1. I have nothing to do with the Red Cross Society; 2. I am not the president of the Red Cross or the descendant of Mr. Guo Moruo; 3. I was certified as an actor by Sina at that time; 4. The Red Cross Chamber of Commerce I mentioned is not the name of a company or institution; 5. I don't want to explain too much about others. Public opinion and rumors are terrible ... Supervision Committee According to the Beijing News reported on February 6, 213, yesterday, Wang Yong, spokesman of the Social Supervision Committee of the Red Cross, formally suggested to the China Red Cross that Guo Meimei's incident be re-investigated and the investigation results be published. The China Red Cross has not made a clear statement on this proposal. Liu Shuwei, a member of the Social Security Committee and a researcher at the Institute of Finance and Economics of the Central University of Finance and Economics, said that Guo Meimei's behavior violated Article 12 of the General Principles of the Civil Law and infringed on the name right of the China Red Cross Society, but the China Red Cross Society has not yet investigated Guo Meimei's legal responsibility. In order to restore credibility, Wang Yong, spokesman of China Red Cross Social Supervision Committee, said on the 24th that the "Guo Meimei Incident" would be re-investigated in the middle and late May. Subsequently, the Social Security Commission also said in the official Weibo that a preliminary understanding had been reached within the Social Security Commission on the re-investigation of Guo Meimei's case, and that the Red Cross Society of China also expressed its willingness to cooperate with the investigation. However, the China Red Cross denied this. Secretary-General Wang Rupeng said through his real name Weibo on 26th that no one in the Red Cross said that Guo Meimei should be re-examined, and the Social Security Committee did not hold a meeting to make a decision to re-examine Guo Meimei. The real situation was the personal proposal of two members of the Social Security Committee. Wang Rupeng also said that the supervisory committee of the Red Cross Society is an independent third party. Whether Guo Meimei should be re-examined will be decided by them independently according to democratic decision-making procedures. The Red Cross Society has no right to interfere. If the social supervisory committee decides to re-examine, the Red Cross Society will actively cooperate. At the same time, the Supervisory Committee of China Red Cross Society further clarified this, pointing out that the "re-investigation of Guo Meimei's incident" is still pending, and no final opinion has been formed. On July 4th, Weng Tao, CEO of Zhonghong Boai Asset Management Co., Ltd., exposed the "truth" in Weibo, saying that Guo Meimei was the girlfriend of Wang Jun, the former director of Zhonghong Boai. Wang Jun claimed that she didn't know Guo Meimei until after the Spring Festival and gave her a Maserati sports car and a famous bag. The Lamborghini, which Guo Meimei calls her own "calf", is really often opened in Wang Jun, and no one nearby has seen it used by others. In Wang Jun, besides Lamborghini, there are luxury cars such as Bentley, among which Bentley is licensed by Shenzhen and Hong Kong, and even the shuttle buses driven by drivers are Mercedes S6. According to the investigation, Zhonghong Boai Asset Management Co., Ltd. was established in 28. It is a national holding investment group and a related enterprise of the China Red Cross (Wang Ding Company, the "backdoor" of the commercial system Red Cross, is the shareholder of Zhonghong Boai). Its main business is about the investment, operation and management of public welfare and service projects related to the Red Cross. Relying on the brand and resources of the China Red Cross Society, the "Red Cross Pok Oi Service Station" cooperated with China Life Insurance Beijing Branch, and achieved good results in operating such a public welfare project, so its outstanding benefits can be seen. Guo Meimei showed off her wealth and pinched each other from a distance with the rich second generation on the Internet. Guo Meimei exposed 5 million casino chips, while Weibo, who had close interaction with SCC Super Run members, exposed 3.7 billion in the bank card of the suspected rich second generation, which made netizens ridicule: "Blink my titanium eyes". The rich second generation of SCC club and Guo Meimei exchanged curses all night. After Guo Meimei exposed 5 million casino chips, the rich second generation returned the balance of the card. The rich second generation provoked Guo Meimei: "@ Guo Meimei Baby, how much is your card? Let's take a look at it, and expose the balance in your bank card, reaching as much as 3.7 billion, which makes netizens stunned. Later, a netizen posted Weibo that "I have counted it several times and lamented that my generation really didn't know that the gap between the rich and the poor is so big now", and the rich second generation once again showed off his wealth and said that he had another 9.9 billion account. As of press time, the true identity of the rich second generation has not been made public, and the bank balance exposed has not been confirmed. The police informed Weibo, the official of Beijing Public Security Bureau, that "Safe Beijing" issued three Weibo notices about Guo Meimei's incident, saying that Guo Meimei and her mother were not directly related to the Red Cross Society of China. The police found out that Guo Meimei was 2 years old and was from Yiyang City, Hunan Province. After receiving the report and carrying out the work according to law, Beixinqiao Police Station of Dongcheng Branch of the Municipal Public Security Bureau found that Guo Meimei and her mother were not directly related to the Red Cross Society of China. In the police investigation, Guo Meimei said: I didn't know about the Red Cross before, didn't know the relevant personnel, and never held relevant positions. It was in a conversation with Shenzhen businessman Wang that I learned about Wang's cooperation intention with the relevant units of the Red Cross Society in the commercial system. After Guo Meimei thought that the "host and actor" originally registered and certified on Sina Weibo had a low level of identity, in order to satisfy her ostentatious psychology, she invented the identity of "Commercial General Manager of China Red Cross Society" herself in May, and submitted it to Sina Weibo website for approval and "V" certification. During the review, Guo Meimei expressed regret and apology for her misconduct. Regarding the "Guo Meimei Case" notification issued by the police, some netizens think that "no direct connection" is too general, and some netizens question whether the real name, identity and property source of the person involved can be seen. More than a month after the "Guo Meimei Incident", Guo Meimei and her mother Guo Dengfeng finally made public appearances to explain the cause and effect of the incident. Yesterday, they were interviewed by scholar Lang Xianping on CBN TV. The whole interview lasted for an hour and was recorded at 1 pm that day. Guo Meimei's mother and daughter received an exclusive interview with Lang Xianping to earn millions in stock trading. In the interview, Guo Meimei said that Wang Jun, a shareholder of Zhonghong Boai, was her "godfather", while Wang Jun was a real estate businessman in Shenzhen, and the luxury car Maserati was given by Wang Jun. Guo Meimei also admitted that she had been questioned by the Public Security Bureau for two days. In addition, Guo Dengfeng also told the outside world in the interview that she was also rich, and she had two houses and millions of cash in Shenzhen in 199. As for its source of wealth, it relies on stock speculation. When there were only five stocks in the stock market, she entered the market, and said that the stock rose by dozens of pieces a day, so she earned millions in a few months. After this interview video was broadcast in the afternoon, it quickly spread on the Internet, causing extensive discussion and some doubts. Event Impact Since a series of events such as the "Guo Meimei Incident" in late June, the amount of social donations and donations from charitable organizations have dropped sharply. According to the latest statistics of the Ministry of Civil Affairs, the national social donation in July was 5 million yuan, a decrease of more than 5% compared with that in June. The amount of donations received by charitable organizations from June to August dropped by 86.6%. According to the data disclosed by the Beijing Red Cross Society, in July 212, the Beijing Red Cross Society accepted 28 social donations, totaling 154,4 yuan. Among them, individual donations were 8 ***7495 yuan, which was greatly reduced compared with previous years. However, the average monthly donation of Beijing Red Cross Society was 1.24 million yuan in 28, 2.2 million yuan in 29 and 7.56 million yuan in 21, which showed a huge gap. It is not only the Beijing Red Cross Society that has encountered the "gap", but also the Shenzhen Red Cross Society. Relevant persons of the above two Red Cross Societies have previously said that the sharp drop in donations is not unrelated to the "Guo Meimei Incident". The "Guo Meimei Incident", which attracted much attention after the incident, seems to have been settled, but the shadow of the crisis of trust it caused to the Red Cross Societies at all levels seems to have just emerged —— In April 211, the father of Shenzhen citizen Wu Jianhong suddenly suffered brain stem hemorrhage, and the Shenzhen Red Cross decided to use the exclusive account of the medical assistance fund of the Society to help Wu Jianhong raise funds. On July 15th, a good-hearted man called and said that he had remitted money to 1 yuan, but Wu Jianhong had not received it until July 28th. Not only that, Zhao Lizhen, vice president of the Shenzhen Red Cross Society, told the reporter that after the "Guo Meimei Incident", the social donation received by the society was almost "". Apart from some directional donations that had been cooperated for a long time, the only donation for more than a month was this 1 yuan. Coincidentally, the Foshan Red Cross Society announced the income and expenditure of funds of the Red Cross hospitals and schools. The school * * * received a donation of 886, yuan, but after the "Guo Meimei Incident", it did not receive any donation. General Meeting Notifies China Red Cross Society about the Investigation and Handling of the Red Cross Society in the Commercial System On December 31, 211, in July 211, the Ministry of Supervision, Institute of Sociology of China Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing Liu An Yuan Law Firm, China Business Federation and China Red Cross Society (hereinafter referred to as the General Meeting) formed a joint investigation team to investigate the relevant issues of the Red Cross Society in the Commercial System (hereinafter referred to as the Commercial Society). The Federation listened carefully to the findings and suggestions of the joint investigation team and studied them carefully. The relevant handling situation is now reported as follows: 1. The investigation results confirm that there is no "Red Cross Chamber of Commerce" in the Shang Red Cross Society, and the post of "General Manager of the Red Cross Society" has not been established; Guo Meimei has nothing to do with the Red Cross Society of China and the Shang Red Cross Society, and her ostentatious wealth has nothing to do with the Red Cross Society, public donations and project funds. Second, since its establishment, the Shang Red Cross Society has not held a member congress in accordance with the requirements of the Constitution of the China Red Cross Society, and there is no leading body such as the Council and the Standing Council, which does not meet the basic organizational requirements of the Red Cross Society in the industry; There is no perfect financial, contract and project management system, and internal management is chaotic; Some responsible persons use their dual identities to have related transactions in the project operation, which seriously violates the basic principles of non-profit organizations. With the consent of the China Business Federation, it is decided to cancel the Red Cross Society of the commercial system, and the remaining problems will be dealt with accordingly according to laws and regulations. 3. The Federation recognizes that it is negligent in management and ineffective in supervision of the organization, system and business development of the Red Cross Society; In the use and protection of the Red Cross brand, the management is lax and the measures are ineffective; It needs to be further strengthened in publishing the use of donated money and materials to the public in a timely, comprehensive, true and accurate manner and satisfying the public's right to know. Here, we are grateful for all the criticisms and suggestions, and hope to take this opportunity to promote reform, reshape social credibility, and ensure the healthy development of the Red Cross cause in China: First, accelerate the institutional reform of the Red Cross. It is necessary to strengthen business guidance, work supervision and financial supervision of local red cross societies and industry red cross societies; Establish a social supervision committee, invite people from all walks of life to supervise the use of social donations and funded projects of the Red Cross, respond to social concerns in a timely manner, and accept social supervision. The second is to use modern scientific and technological means to establish a clear workflow and system for information disclosure. Establish a unified national Red Cross information platform, do a good job in the information disclosure of public donations according to the principles of timeliness, accuracy, convenience, standardization and order, and protect the donors and the public's right to know and supervise. The third is to strengthen the management of the Red Cross brand. Strictly use the logo and name of the Red Cross, actively encourage all sectors of society to participate in the development of the Red Cross cause, and at the same time establish corresponding moral standards to ensure that the policies and behaviors of cooperative institutions do not contradict the mission of the Red Cross cause. Fourth, strengthen anti-corruption, seize key risk points such as donations and bidding, and truly realize the openness of donations and transparent financial management; seek tenders