1. Similar trademarks are considered as infringement. 2. According to the law, without the permission of the trademark registrant, it is an infringement to use a trademark similar to its registered trademark on the same commodity, or to use a trademark identical with or similar to its registered trademark on similar commodities, which is likely to cause confusion.

Legal objectivity:

Article 64 of the Trademark Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) * * * Where the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark claims compensation, and the accused infringer makes a defense on the grounds that the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark has not used the registered trademark, the people's court may require the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark to provide evidence of the actual use of the registered trademark in the previous three years. If the exclusive right holder of a registered trademark cannot prove that the registered trademark has been actually used in the first three years, nor can he prove that he has suffered other losses due to infringement, the accused infringer shall not be liable for compensation. If you sell a commodity that you don't know is an infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark, and you can prove that the commodity was legally obtained by yourself and explain the supplier, you will not be liable for compensation. Article 65 of the Trademark Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) * * * Where a trademark registrant or interested party has evidence to prove that another person is committing or will commit an act that infringes on his exclusive right to use a registered trademark, if it is not stopped in time, his legitimate rights and interests will be irretrievably damaged, he may apply to the people's court for measures ordered to stop relevant acts and property preservation according to law before prosecution.