The main reason why the anchor was named this time is that there are irregularities in the delivery process, such as exaggerating publicity and selling. Three no products? , the commodity label is not standardized, the fruit is short of weight and so on, and the irregularity involved in the process of bringing goods in Li Jiaqi is that the commodity label is not standardized.

The so-called nonstandard commodity label refers to the fact that the label of a commodity does not clearly or accurately indicate the name of the producer, the production address, the country of origin of the product, the agent and a series of text labels that inform consumers of commodity information. Non-standard product labels will seriously infringe consumers' right to know, so that consumers can buy products they don't want or products that are inconsistent with consumers' inner expectations. This kind of behavior makes consumers have some complaints in their hearts, but it also triggers a series of consumer rights protection incidents. Therefore, standardizing the use of commodity labels is a very important event.

Fortunately, this time, it is only a name-calling criticism. We believe that Li Jiaqi, who has a sense of social responsibility, will definitely put this problem in place, so that consumers can buy with confidence.

look at other sales irregularities, among which sales? Three no products? It should be an unacceptable behavior for consumers. First of all, there is no information such as the distributor, trademark and product model that should be responsible for the product. Once this product causes economic and property losses to consumers, it is inconvenient to even protect their rights, because consumers don't even know the basic information of the product. Secondly, this "three noes" product has not been tested by relevant departments, that is, the danger of consumers using this product will be greatly increased. The anchor's sales of this product can be said to put the interests of consumers 18 thousand miles away.

and exaggerating publicity and short of fruit in sales seem to be better than? Three no products? The harm is much less, but it also seriously infringes on the rights and interests of consumers. Consumers' money is hard earned, and every penny they spend is worth it, so consumers will not buy products that are not worth it. It is a kind of harm to consumers that the anchor sells the products through these means to obtain huge benefits.

I hope they can make a thorough rectification, so that everyone can buy and use with confidence.

answers and picture deletion.