First of all, you need to know the circumstances of trademark rejection review and then propose whether to conduct a review as needed. 1. The applied trademark is an unregistered trademark previously used by the applicant. After long-term use and publicity, it has gained a certain degree of popularity and reputation. The applied trademark has been widely used by the applicant, has formed a corresponding relationship with the applicant, and has the distinction that a trademark should have.

2. The trademark applied for is a brand-new trademark originally designed by the applicant, which is original and distinctive. The application for approval and registration of a trademark will not cause confusion or misunderstanding among the relevant public.

3. The applied trademark is clearly different from the cited trademark in terms of constituent elements, drawing method, overall appearance, salient parts, name, meaning, etc., which will not confuse consumers and do not constitute similar trademarks. Among them, specific differences in components, drawing methods, overall appearance, salient parts, calls, meanings, etc. can be proved through detailed explanations to enhance persuasiveness.

4. Based on the principle of consistent examination standards and combined with this case, each cited trademark contains similar components and overlaps in similar groups approved for use, but they were eventually approved for registration one after another.

5. Similar factors in a trademark are not the decisive reason for rejection. Therefore, if a trademark has its own distinctive features and can play the role of distinguishing the source of goods or services, it should be approved for registration.