1. Tencent Intellectual Property Wang Xiaoxia (How long does Tencent’s copyright last)

Tencent’s Intellectual Property Wang Xiaoxia (How long does Tencent’s copyright last) 1. How long does Tencent’s copyright last?

Official website: Copyright statement Tencent owns copyright and other intellectual property rights for all contents including but not limited to products or services issued or jointly issued with partner companies and materials on Tencent's website, which are protected by law.

Without the written permission of our company, no unit or individual may use, copy, modify, copy, disseminate or use any part of the above products, services, information and materials in any way or for any reason or with other products. Used and sold in bundles. Anyone who infringes upon the company's copyright and other intellectual property rights will be held accountable by the company in accordance with the law.

The Legal Affairs Department of our company is instructed by our company and hereby solemnly declares the law! Declared unit: Tencent Legal Affairs Department. Relevant provisions of the Copyright Law: The duration of copyright, in simple terms, for individuals, is fifty years after death, and there is no limit on the duration of moral rights such as signature rights; for units and legal persons, it is fifty years after the work is first published. .

2. Who knows examples of intellectual property rights?

The first instance of the Coral QQ infringement case sentenced Chen Shoufu to 3 years in prison

The much-watched Coral QQ infringement case The result: On the 20th, the Shenzhen Nanshan District Court made a first-instance verdict: Chen Shoufu, the producer of the Coral QQ software, was guilty of copyright infringement and was sentenced to 3 years in prison and fined RMB 1.2 million. His illegal income was RMB 1.1728 million. Yuan shall be recovered.

After trial, the court found that from 2005 to 2007, the defendant Chen Shoufu produced the Coral QQ software for profit-making purposes without the permission of Tencent, which contained more than 95 files of Tencent QQ software, and It has the same substantive functions as Tencent QQ software; at the same time, the defendant Chen Shoufu placed the Coral QQ software on the Internet for others to download. His behavior constituted the copying and distribution of Tencent QQ software. Chen Shoufu made a profit of 1.1728 million yuan, which is illegal income. The amount was huge, and his behavior constituted the crime of copyright infringement. The facts of the crime charged by the public prosecution were clear, the evidence was reliable and sufficient, and the charges were found guilty. The defendant Chen Shoufu pleaded guilty in court.

The court rejected the defender’s plea of ??not guilty due to insufficient evidence. The court’s final verdict: The defendant Chen Shoufu was guilty of copyright infringement and was sentenced to 3 years in prison and fined 1.2 million yuan; the defendant Chen Shoufu’s illegal income totaling 1.1728 million yuan was recovered.

Tencent stated that Tencent respects the court’s decision. Intellectual property protection is very critical to China's growing Internet industry, and the legitimate rights and interests of users and enterprises should be protected by law. Zhu Xiequn, a professor at Shenzhen University Law School, said that the outcome of the trial of the Coral QQ case will become a benchmark for intellectual property protection in the Internet industry.

This case is very typical! !

3. Has Tencent infringed on the patent of U.S. Unilon?

No

In June 2016, ZTE, Huawei, and WeChat were sued by U.S. companies. The incident: Uniloc sued Tencent US in the Eastern Federal District Court of Texas, on the grounds that WeChat’s group voice chat and video group chat functions infringed their patents and requested WeChat to immediately terminate these functions! Tencent responded: It has not received the indictment.

Uniloc is known as a "patent troll" in the industry and is engaged in patent licensing matters. The company itself does not manufacture patented products. It purchases patent licenses and files patent lawsuits against other large companies to obtain high profits.

The concept of applying for a patent in the United States is very vague, which allows such companies to take advantage of loopholes. For example, if someone develops a piece of software, Uniloc will not sue the developer. Uniloc claims that it has a patent for using the software and will sue other wealthy people who use the software.

It is reported that the reason why Uniloc sued large companies in the Eastern Federal District Court of Texas is because the judge of this court specializes in litigation for Uniloc.

Uniloc has exploited legal loopholes, so large companies must do their homework when developing and releasing software.