This is a swindler's trick, which deliberately causes the seller to panic and then takes the opportunity to blackmail the seller. It doesn't matter. What they dare not complain about on Taobao is just to scare new sellers and blackmail them. However, it should be noted that in the future, if someone buys a lot of Q coins at one time, 90% of them are liars. Personally, a real buyer can't buy dozens of dollars at most. So the next time someone buys a lot of Q coins at one time, they should be vigilant. Virtual products are easy to gain credibility and attract scammers.
Malicious complainants are market competitors. Malicious complainants in the field of e-commerce mainly include two types: one is the actor engaged in commodity business or profit-making services, such as the operator who complains in violation of due diligence obligations; The other is an actor who does not engage in commercial transactions, such as an actor who only complains through malicious registered trademarks but is not an operator. Paragraph 3 of Article 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law stipulates that the term "business operators" as mentioned in this Law refers to legal persons, other economic organizations and individuals engaged in commodity business or profit-making services (hereinafter referred to as commodities including services). So the first kind of malicious complainant naturally meets the requirements of the anti-unfair competition law? Operator? The definition of being a market competitor.
Whether there is a competitive relationship between the complainant and the respondent must be analyzed in detail. The second kind of malicious complainants mostly do not engage in actual business, but only obtain the identity of external rights holders by means of maliciously registering trademarks or domain names, registering shell companies or forging certificates. This kind of malicious complainant can hardly be defined as unfair competition in a narrow sense? Operator? Therefore, it cannot be regulated by the anti-unfair competition law. Malicious complaints violate the principle of good faith and recognized business ethics. The Anti-Unfair Competition Law encourages and protects fair competition.
As one of the operators in the field of e-commerce, the complainant should abide by the principle of good faith and recognized business ethics. Malicious complainants complain when they know that their rights, status and ownership are uncertain or that businesses' actions are not infringing, which leads to third-party platforms deleting product links of other businesses, hindering the normal business activities of other businesses, or seeking illegal interests by such improper means, which obviously violates the principle of good faith and recognized business ethics.