First of all, the orders received by the Northeast Army at that time were not to resist. Who gave the order is not discussed here. I don't want to give examples of those data. I'll search online myself. I can give you an intuitive comparison. At that time, we thought that the Indian army in the Sino-Indian border war and the Japanese army in the Sino-Indian border war were like the People's Liberation Army. Although India is well equipped, its firepower allocation is unreasonable, some are still using shotguns and crossbows, some are quasi-Soviet machinery and quasi-American mechanization; Indian soldiers' qualities are uneven, they fight for no reason, and they lack the initiative to fight. They take the belief of being wise to protect themselves as their creed and command many ineffectiveness from low to high. Although the weapons are excellent, they are disorganized or not in place. They are unfamiliar with the operation and have no industrial support, so they can only buy them from outside. Military training is not in place. On the other hand, the PLA is really similar to the Japanese army. Although the weapons and equipment are poor but unified, they can be used skillfully and the firepower distribution is balanced. Domestic industries can solve the maintenance and supply of weapons by themselves. Soldiers actively fight, have high initiative and sacrifice spirit, usually have better training and higher comprehensive quality; Senior officers command effectively, and grass-roots officers can strictly carry out orders. So we can compare the two to see who will win.