Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Overdue credit card - How to reject the overdue credit card being sued in different places?
How to reject the overdue credit card being sued in different places?
Submit a statement of objection to jurisdiction to the court. If the credit card is sued in a different court because it is overdue, but the cardholder is inconvenient to appear in court, he can apply to the court for jurisdictional objection and apply for hearing the case at the cardholder's place.

1. How to dismiss the overdue prosecution of credit cards in different places?

An application for objection to jurisdiction may be submitted to the court to explain the situation. Specifically, after receiving a summons from the court, he contacted the judge in charge of the case, asked about the case and expressed his wishes, and filled out an application form and handed it to our hospital. As long as it is reasonable, then the court will dismiss the bank's lawsuit. If the bank wants to sue again, it can only be done at the domicile of the parties.

2. Who can object to jurisdiction?

1. The subject of jurisdiction objection can only be the defendant in this case. The plaintiff can't raise any objection to the jurisdiction, because the plaintiff took the initiative to file a lawsuit and chose the court of jurisdiction for this lawsuit. If the plaintiff is allowed to raise an objection to jurisdiction, it is undoubtedly an objection to his choice. The additional joint plaintiff cannot raise jurisdiction objection, because the plaintiff's prosecution has legal effect on other joint plaintiffs, so the additional plaintiff cannot raise jurisdiction objection.

2. A third party with an independent claim can't object to the jurisdiction, because the third party lawsuit filed by a third party with an independent claim is a participatory lawsuit, which is based on the existence of this lawsuit, so it can't object to the jurisdiction of this lawsuit.

3. A third party without independent claim can't object to jurisdiction. The participation of the third party without independent claim in the lawsuit itself determines that its participation as a participant is based on the existence of the lawsuit, and questioning the jurisdiction of the lawsuit will lead to the uncertainty of the lawsuit. For some courts that stand on the position of local protectionism, the practice of adding a third party without independent claim and transferring the responsibility to this third party is itself a problem of the third party system without independent claim, which cannot be solved by expanding the subject of jurisdiction objection. Moreover, the territorial jurisdiction system does not have the function of preventing judicial local protectionism, because in any case, jurisdiction may be the court where one party is located.

4. Because there is no counterpart in civil disputes in non-litigation cases, there is no objection to jurisdiction, and even other people who have actual indirect interests in non-litigation cases do not enjoy litigation rights.

If the cardholder can't attend the trial, he should apply to the court for jurisdiction objection in time, and make it clear to the court why he can't attend the trial in a different place. After review, the court considers it reasonable, and will pass the application and finally decide to hold a hearing at the cardholder's domicile.