So 50 million, sentenced to 5 years and fined 100,000 yuan?

Due to the bank's assessment tasks, some people used credit cards to cash out in order to help their colleagues complete the assessment, and were eventually found to have cashed out 50 million yuan. Since 50 million yuan has constituted an illegal operation, So the court sentenced her to 5 years and fined her 100,000 yuan! The person involved in the case was a director of a bank and had won many awards within the bank. He should be regarded as a good employee who works diligently, but because of the assessment tasks issued by the bank, he ended up helping others cash out and got himself into a lawsuit!

At first, she applied for a mobile POS machine through a relative. Later, due to various reasons, the POS machines were placed in two sporting goods stores for relatives, friends and bank colleagues to swipe credit cards, and then she transferred the money. Transfer it to them through your debit card, and there is no handling fee! According to this view, this is purely to help others, and it can even be said to be for the benefit of the company, because every time a credit card is swiped through the POS machine, the bank charges a handling fee. Therefore, the director involved in the case was not satisfied with being sentenced to 5 years and fined 100,000 yuan!

I still remember that when I was working as a cashier in a store, customers always asked us if we could cash out. At that time, we just told the customers that they couldn’t cash out because the company had regulations! At that time, there were still customers who needed cash urgently, so they said, I would use my credit card to buy things in the store, pay a small fee, and give him cash back! Now think about it, this idea seems simple, but in fact it is illegal!

Regarding this case, the director involved said that he only violated the agreement on using the credit card and did not break the law! Her lawyer also submitted the bank's task indicators to the court as evidence, and said: The people involved did not conduct business, and the credit cards used were for a few fixed people, colleagues and friends, and were not oriented to society. In addition, the persons involved did not charge any handling fees, which is incomparable with the general cash-out in society. Therefore, they continued to appeal to the court, requesting that the original verdict be dismissed and the verdict changed to not guilty! The follow-up situation still needs to wait for the final judgment of the court!