The first criterion: the country’s performance in the Olympics or World Championships under a non-national system, that is, the number of medals

I emphasize this not against China, but The national system for running sports is indeed quite deformed.

This system is quite hypocritical and deceptive. It can be said that China does not use this system

This system cannot win gold medals in diving, shooting, and women's weightlifting, because diving in China

does not have any mass base, and guns are banned. The power of Chinese women God is inherently inferior to Europe and the United States,

Moreover, Chinese women’s minds are not suitable for engaging in this pure strength sport.

At present, the only countries in the world that use the nationwide system are China and North Korea. As for the United States

Some countries such as the United States will also conduct concentrated training before the competition. I think this has nothing to do with the nationwide system.

The nationwide system does not mean centralized training.

So does using the nationwide system have a great advantage in winning gold medals?

The answer is yes. North Korea is not taken into account due to its special financial resources.

Please look at East Germany and the Soviet Union in the 1988 Seoul Olympics gold medal list.

The 24th Seoul Olympics (1988)

National gold, silver and bronze medals

Soviet Union 55 31 46

GDR 37 35 30

United States 36 31 27

South Korea 12 10 11

West Germany 11 14 15

Hungary 11 6 5

Bulgaria 10 12 13

Romania 7 11 6

The national system has obviously been rejected by the international community due to its deformity and hypocrisy.

And it is closely connected with politics. It seriously violates the original loyalty of sports. China dare not give up the national system. I think there are two reasons.

1. Once this system is abandoned, it is very likely to be on par with India in terms of performance, and it will expose some contradictions in Chinese society. I will not say more about political issues. ．

2. There are a large number of immediate interest groups in this system.

The second standard is: the professional level of national sports projects. To meet the conditions for professionalization of sports projects

the country’s citizens have a certain consumption level, unless the project It is extremely popular in the country, such as football in some South American countries.

There is no doubt that only professional athletes can represent the highest level of sports.

The greatest value of workers can only be fully squeezed out in the hands of capitalists.

People always hope to have this kind of comparison, that is, athletes from all countries are under the same conditions

Training to see whose national athletes are the strongest, let’s not say that this situation is not Possibly, and

over-emphasis on this concept can easily lead to the idea of ??racial superiority and national superiority.

This kind of idea is quite sensitive and taboo internationally. Germany in World War II was largely caused by this kind of thinking. If you ask American leaders why the United States has the most advanced technology, he obviously cannot say that it is because of the United States. This is why people are smarter than other countries.

In fact, it is not because Americans are smarter. What is certain is that Chinese table tennis is better than Japan and South Korea. It is definitely not because the Chinese are inherently better than the Japanese and the Koreans are suitable for playing table tennis.

Of course, the physical fitness of people in each continent is indeed inherently different.

Simply put.

In fact, the level of athletes in any country is higher than the level of professionalism. This country has many professional athletes, so this country must be a sports powerhouse.

The only professional athletes in our country are men’s football, men’s basketball, Ding Junhui and some chess players.

The third criterion is the influence and popularity of sports: it is reasonable to pursue equality among people, but the pursuit of equality in sports is obviously against nature and impossible to achieve.

Just like technology, only those who excel in industries such as integrated circuits, software, automobiles, and agriculture can be called a technological power. God and heaven can't explain anything.

Take CCTV’s sports news as an example. Except during major competitions, the sports with the highest coverage are definitely football, tennis, NBA, F1. (Ranking is not based on priority)

These projects are also professional.

These projects are not our country’s advantageous projects. Even if our country is like this, how can you expect other countries to pay attention to our country’s advantageous projects such as diving and weightlifting?

According to the above three criteria, our country is not a sports power