1. The title is facade. Every assessor will read the tender extensively before reading it intensively. In extensive reading, the first impression produced by the title and abstract is very important, second only to the hard indicators such as the applicant's scientific research background. The topic should be clear and definite. Let the evaluation experts know the purpose and general content of this project at a glance.

2. The topic is simple and clear, so that peers can understand it. Nobody likes big and empty topics. Don't try to change the world through a project. It is difficult to make a breakthrough in a scientific problem.

3. cherish words like gold. Cut to the chase and directly show the research content and ideas. Try to include four elements of scientific hypothesis: clinical problems, scientific problems, target molecules and mechanism of action. There should not be one more word in the final topic, that is, "words cannot be deleted."

4. If you can make experts feel "Hey ~ this topic is interesting!" Of course it is best; If not, let the expert "Oh, that's what he studied".

A simple and clear topic, even if it won't add points, at least it won't reduce points. Now the title is limited to 100 characters, in which a Chinese character, a number and a letter are all recorded as one character. In fact, this restriction is meaningless unless you risk trying a long topic in order to be unconventional. In this kind of application competition for science funds, the high probability of being unconventional has no good result.

6. The unsuccessful projects have their own shortcomings, and the successful ones are almost the same. Constantly moving closer to the winning project means moving closer to the standards of bid evaluation experts, and the chances of winning the bid will be great. The websites of NSFC official website, Dingxiangtong, Science Network, Medsci, geenmedical, etc. can all find the information of previous winning projects and abstracts. Look carefully, read carefully and learn from it.

7. The project name cannot be duplicate or similar to the previous project, so it is easy for experts to reject the project with the opinions of "repeated funding" or "not innovative enough". When inquiring about past projects, pay attention to finding the differences, which are reflected in the eye-catching position of the tender, especially in the title and abstract. Let the experts know that your project is a step forward on the basis of predecessors.

8. Make the awkward content in the topic more comfortable. There are no punctuation marks on the topic, which may be ambiguous. Find more people to review, to ensure that there is no ambiguity, easy to understand.

9. For projects with ethical audit, the project name must be consistent with the ethical name. If there is no time to modify ethics, then the title should not be changed.

10. Chinese and English titles have the same meaning. The English words of keywords need to be academically accurate, and proper nouns must be selected in Pubmed, which can be selected from the medical thesaurus, namely MeSH database. After writing English titles, go to Pubmed and Google for academic search.

1 1. The title should be consistent with the content and logic of the abstract. Don't let the judging experts feel like jumping through the topic before reading the abstract.