Generally speaking, the advantage of declaring a scenic spot as a research and travel base is that it can provide a deeper learning experience and increase the visibility and attraction of the scenic spot. The disadvantage is that it may require more capital and manpower investment and meet stricter educational standards and requirements. These advantages and disadvantages are essentially due to the difference between research travel and traditional tourism. Research travel is a kind of travel mode with learning and experience as its main purpose. Compared with traditional tourism, it pays more attention to learning effect and depth, and pays more attention to interaction and participation. Therefore, applying the scenic spot as a research travel base can provide more and more in-depth research activities and attract more tourists with learning needs. But at the same time, there are also some shortcomings in study tour. Due to the particularity of research travel, tourist attractions need to undertake more responsibilities of education and cultural heritage, and need to provide more rigorous and professional tour guides and service teams, and these costs and pressures will be passed on to the scenic spots themselves. In addition, study tour pays more attention to learning effect. If the study content in the scenic spot is not rich and in-depth, it will be difficult to attract more study tourists.