The State Council issued a document proposing that all government agencies and institutions should carry out pension consolidation reform.

So, in the wage reform of public institutions, whose wages have increased? I have compiled relevant content for you in this article, and you are welcome to read and understand.

Wage reform in public institutions, whose wages have increased? Not all public institutions have been included in the reform scope of the "Decision of the State Council on the Reform of the Pension Insurance System for Staff of Government Institutions and Public Institutions".

It is reported that the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and the Ministry of Finance have issued the "Notice on Implementing the "Decision of the State Council on the Reform of the Pension Insurance System for Staff of Government Institutions and Public Institutions"", which clearly divides the scope of the reform: civil servants and public institutions

The first and second categories of public welfare in China will participate in the unified reform of pension insurance, while the third category of public welfare institutions such as news media will gradually transition to corporate pension insurance.

This means that in the future, the pension insurance of the third category of public welfare institutions will not be in the same "pool" as other agencies and institutions.

The notice from the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security stipulates that as an implementation of the "integration of elderly care" policy for government agencies and institutions, the implementation measures of each locality must be reported to the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security for filing before the end of May.

Only current employees of public institutions can participate in the pension reform. The “Decision of the State Council on the Reform of the Pension Insurance System for Staff of Government Institutions and Public Institutions” promulgated in January this year proposed that all government agencies and public institutions should carry out pension reform.

Since the basic pension insurance funds of government agencies and institutions have separate accounts, they are managed and used separately from the basic pension insurance funds of enterprise employees.

Many people expect that all public institutions will participate in this reform and, together with government agencies, will enter into a special account for the "Basic Pension Insurance Fund for Government Institutions and Public Institutions" in addition to the corporate pension insurance fund.

In fact, after inquiry, it was found that the objects of the "Decision" are units managed in accordance with the Civil Servant Law, agencies (units) managed with reference to the Civil Servant Law, public institutions and their staff within their establishments.

In other words, even if you work in a public institution, you cannot participate in the pension insurance reform of government institutions without establishment.

The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and the Ministry of Finance have issued the "Notice on Implementing the "Decision of the State Council on the Reform of the Pension Insurance System for Staff of Government Institutions and Public Institutions" (Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security [2015] No. 28), which further clarifies that participating institutions

Pension insurance institutions refer to public welfare first-class and second-class public institutions that have been classified and reformed in accordance with relevant regulations.

"Public welfare third category" public institutions have gradually turned their pension into enterprises. In accordance with the policies issued by the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and others, in the reform of the pension insurance of government agencies and public institutions, fully allocated government agencies and public institutions participate in the pension insurance, and participation is realized through financial and personal contributions.

Insurance; for units with shortfall allocations, finance, units, and individuals must pay contributions to participate in the insurance.

The third category of public welfare institutions that are responsible for their own profits and losses will eventually participate in corporate pension insurance.

This is slightly different from the previously announced occupational annuity practice.

As one of the major measures to unify pension funds, the occupational annuity that the state promotes compulsorily in government agencies and institutions is only divided into two categories. One category is for units with full financial contributions, which are realized by contributions from units and individuals;

For units with "full financial contributions", unit payments shall be accumulated in real accounts.

This statement actually means that in non-financial fully funded public institutions, as long as they have a staff, occupational annuities must be established. Occupational annuities are opposite to enterprise annuities and belong to the unique category of government agencies and public institutions.

Yang Sui, a professor at the School of Public Policy and Management at Tsinghua University, analyzed that for public institutions that are responsible for their own profits and losses, occupational annuity expenses are labor costs that must be borne.