Both funds are passive index investments, and the investment targets are the Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 Index. The daily investment tracking error range is 0.3, and the subscription rate is also 1.5, so in general, the two funds are very similar.

Difference: 1. The two funds were established at different times. Harvest CSI 300 was established in August 2005, just before the big bull market in June 2007 and 2007, so the cumulative income at the end of the period has reached 2.505 1. However, the Southern CSI 300 was established in May 2009, and the accumulated income so far is low, which is 0.9935.

The dividends of the two companies are different. Harvest Shanghai and Shenzhen will be distributed up to 4 times a year, and South Shanghai and Shenzhen will be distributed up to 12 times a year.

3. At present, the net worth of the two companies is different, with Harvest Shanghai and Shenzhen being 0.637 1 and Southern Shanghai and Shenzhen being 0.8335. In the case of a certain amount of principal, the number of shares that can be purchased will be different, but the net value of index funds has little effect on future income.

4. Management companies are different from fund managers. However, Harvest and Nanfang are very good fund companies, and this influence is not great.