you can continue to pay.

Recently, a letter from an investor to China Credit Trust was circulated on the Internet. The author was the investor of Evergrande Project No.3 of China Credit Trust New Energy. According to the trust contract, it expired on March 5, 222. As of March 9, 222, the investor had not received the principal and interest of the trust project. Therefore, investors wrote and exposed through the media, urging China Credit Trust to continue to pay rigidly.

it is mentioned in the letter that in September 221, after the explosion of Evergrande, investors called China Credit Trust to put forward a proposal to end the Evergrande project as soon as possible, but China Credit Trust paid the interest in September and December 221 in advance and did not announce the early maturity of the principal. Until March 5, 222, after the investor's principal expires, all Evergrande products have not been announced to be terminated in advance, and the investor has not received the principal and interest. In the letter, investors raised seven questions about the project, and whether it is true or not remains to be verified. Based on these seven questions, this paper expounds how individual investors are "bitter" and "unable to survive", and asks the trust company to solve the principal and interest problem of Evergrande New Energy No.3 Project. Structurally, this is a very standard "debt collection exposure letter". The trust industry has carefully examined the investors' questions, and the following points are worthy of attention (integrated with the investors' questions): 1. After the lightning storm of Evergrande Group, why did China Credit Trust not end the project ahead of schedule to prevent and control risks, but continue to pay the interest in September and December 221? 2. Will the funds for paying the interest in September and December 221 come from Evergrande or China Credit Trust? 3. New Energy Project No.3 is issued in several batches, some of which have already paid the principal and interest according to the investment time sequence. This distribution method is understandable for projects without mine explosion, but it is unfair for Evergrande projects with serious problems to pay back in time sequence. Why not pay back according to the investment proportion? 4. Is there any truthful information disclosure about the collateral of New Energy No.3 and other issues of the project? On January 6, 222, China Credit Trust issued an interim announcement, claiming that the counterparty (Shimao) of "22 China Credit Trust Chengyi No.11 Collective Fund Trust Plan" failed to fulfill the obligation to make up the difference in time and in full at the time agreed in the contract, and there has been a substantial breach of contract. It was later determined to be an extension. Contrary to Chengyi No.11, Evergrande Real Estate has been thundering for a long time, and it no longer pays loans from financial institutions. Trust products have defaulted in a large area, but Zhongxin Trust New Energy No.3 has been paying investors' interest and has not defaulted on investors. Now, the investor's principal of Evergrande products has expired. Is China Credit Trust extended like Shimao, or is it different from Shimao products that have just been exchanged for investors? According to the trust industry, China Credit Trust has just changed coaches recently, and the new president and chairman are appointed by China People's Insurance Group. In September, 221, the new president of China Credit Trust, An Guoyong, was approved for the post, and Evergrande just thundered at this time. On December 9, Li Zhuyong served as the chairman of the company, followed by the announcement of the extension of Shimao products. The payment of Evergrande and Shimao products is a difficult problem for the two new coaches.