Hello. The science fund project you applied for has passed the preliminary examination of the Ministry of Science and Technology, peer expert review and discipline review group review. This year's credit evaluation results are generally good, and there are many projects with good credit evaluation results. In the case of limited funding conditions, the projects funded are limited, and your project application has not been approved this year. I hope you can understand. In order to make the evaluation of NSFC more objective, fair and transparent, we have sent back the full text of peer review opinions to you for reference only when applying for projects in the future. 1. Peer comments on your project are as follows: the research objectives are too broad. The related research contents and methods put forward in this project have no special innovation and characteristics. The research content is informative, the research idea is clear, the research scheme is reasonable and feasible, and the applicant and the research team have good research foundation and working conditions to ensure the smooth implementation of the project and achieve cutting-edge results. As a youth fund project, it is recommended to give priority to funding. The research goal of the project is clear, the research content has good innovation and research value, and the research scheme is reasonable; The applicant has a certain working foundation, the project team members are properly configured, the budget is basically reasonable, and the testing conditions are basically complete. Therefore, the project funding is agreed. Inorganic Chemistry, Department of Chemical Science, National Natural Science Foundation of China