This man is aggressive, and more than half of his answers are fooling around with others or mocking. For those who disagree with their views, don't refute them directly. Instead, I like to catch words and report them to the black, and sometimes I will secretly provoke+report them to the black+ridicule, so that the other party can eat a dumb loss.
So, if you don't agree with him, I suggest you don't try to reason with him. Seriously discussing this irrationality is just mocking the large flow of attacks and wasting time.
Pay attention to maintaining the big V, with high yield but basically ambiguous answers, or articles that bicker with others, or long articles that are irrelevant, and there are few dry goods or profound words. Between the lines, I like freedom but lack of content, and I like to emphasize rationality but lack of depth, so I guess fennel can be written in four ways.
But then again, it is good at bickering.
Maybe I read a book. If you spray people, don't swear, and pull a long article full of war, you can also attract good people to applaud again and again.
It seems that people who are blacked out by all rude bans can go to Zhihu, and even many questions about him are banned.
Summarized as follows:
It seems to be still dark recently, and half of the answers are still mocking others, which has not changed at all. This kind of traffic is big, except for saying something irrelevant and irrelevant, you can only rely on black to maintain traffic. They have no ink on their chests and can only bring rhythm by attacking the darkness. This kind of person is really sad.