The account received 3.85 million yuan, and the Henan woman returned the principal of 850,000 yuan, and the defendant went to court. The court ruled that the case was an unjust enrichment dispute, and the bank informed it as the original request. The court of Luoyang High-tech Zone ordered the defendant to return more than 2.42 million yuan to the plaintiff, and the interest felt that the court decision was not very reasonable. Obviously, the bank made a mistake. Why is this woman responsible? It is said that she has no responsibility to leave the cabinet. Why is it so double standard now?

Some people will put extra money into trust investment, which will also earn some interest. A woman trust in Henan invested 3 million yuan in principal, and then the account suddenly received 3.85 million yuan. After receiving the money, the lady felt something was wrong, because the payment was too sudden, and he was very happy to get back the 3 million principal. But as a more rational investor, it is impossible to generate such a large income of 850,000 yuan in such a short time, so he is a little anxious. Only then did I tell the lady that the money was returned wrongly, and the trust company also held an emergency meeting and issued a notice saying that only 19.3% of the principal was returned. Obviously it is your own money, why do you only pay so much principal? This woman was also taken to court by the company.

Is it necessary to take responsibility for the bank's mistakes? Moreover, the people in the trust company said that the bank had mislaid the money and the overpaid money should be refunded. They also advised the woman not to go through the public prosecution procedure, saying that the bank made a mistake first, and they would apologize and make the situation clear. I feel that this woman is still very cultured and rational. They only left the principal of 3 million and directly returned the extra 850 thousand. She is not the kind of person who completely forgets profits.

The people of this trust company also said that more than 70 customers across the country were overpaid by banks. Now only this woman's money has not been returned, and all the others have been returned. I want to ask which bank this bank is and tell them so that everyone can be protected against lightning. After all, there is really no need for such a bank to exist. I hope this lady can continue to appeal and safeguard her legitimate interests.