In terms of cost, the subscription fee of Huaxia 300 is 1.2%, that of Harvest 300 is 1.5%, that of management fee is 0.5%, and that of custody fee is 0. 1%. The cost of Huaxia is slightly lower. Because these two companies are established companies, and other index funds of Huaxia Company are doing quite well, we have reason to believe that Huaxia 300' s ability to track the index will not be worse than Jiashi 300' s, and Huaxia's performance comparison benchmark is CSI 300' s yield × 95%+ 1%, which should be better than Jiashi 300' s 5.0 %× interbank deposit rate +95.0 %× CSI 300 index, so Huaxia However, I have checked other index funds in China, and there are very few dividends. Harvest pays dividends more frequently. For index funds, dividends are very important when the market turns, such as the 6000-point decline in 2007. There is a big difference between paying dividends and not paying dividends. In fact, I personally think that index funds are not worth long-term investment. You can go to my QQ space to see the truth about index funds. Wind's data shows that the net growth rate of the top 30 domestic equity funds has been better than that of the Shanghai Composite Index in the same period, with an average exceeding range of nearly 200%. At present, the stock index is around 3000 points, and only the big bull market in 2007 is higher than this point in history, indicating that this point is not low. I think index funds are not suitable for long-term investment, but more suitable for speculation. In fact, financial institutions such as funds and securities companies often make profits by shorting index funds. The net subscription after the plunge of index funds often reported by the media is such a reason. Investment is risky, so be careful. In 2008, index funds fell the most, and in August 2009, index funds fell the most. I hope you choose carefully.

Seek adoption