First, the key to choosing a correct topic is to choose a topic with its own characteristics and obtain rich preliminary research results. First, the declared topic should be one that you have started or are studying, and should have rich preliminary research results. Experts in the evaluation should first look at whether the applicant has previous achievements. This is a very important condition. Therefore, our usual scientific research should have a stable research direction, persevere and accumulate for a long time. People's energy is limited, and the research direction should not be too broad. From the perspective of evaluating professional titles, you may write more and faster articles in different easy-to-write directions because of the required number of achievements. However, from the perspective of applying for a topic and carrying out research, we need rich preliminary research results, so we should set a good research direction early, and stabilize the research direction, start with small topics, start with small articles, persevere and accumulate constantly. In addition, we should not only have our own preliminary results, but also understand the domestic research situation in this field. It is very important to master the frontier of the subject, make clear the specific research content, and make the subject declared by yourself advanced. Second, the topic must have important characteristics. First of all, we should reflect the characteristics of the times and choose the key points, hot spots and problems that need to be solved urgently as the research direction. Secondly, to reflect the characteristics of different colleges and universities, there are advantages with characteristics. Choosing a topic should be like doing business. "You don't have me, you have me, and you forced me to change." In addition, for the declared subject, it is best to have field research data or summarize the experience of the actual work department. Because the information of field investigation is the most characteristic. Only with the actual survey data can you declare the characteristics of the topic you report, otherwise your topic will not impress people. Three, the declaration of discipline should comply with the requirements of the "discipline guide". Of course, we don't mean that we must use the topic of "topic guide" as the topic, but that the topic to be declared should conform to the scope of "topic guide". The National Social Science Fund formulates a guide once a year, and the subject of the Ministry of Education is every five-year plan. It entrusts scholars from various disciplines to draw up a consultation report on the five-year plan and puts forward the main problems that should be studied by various disciplines in five years. Why must I meet the requirements of the Project Guide? Because the topics mentioned in the Project Guide are basic theoretical issues that need to be studied at present, and they are also important issues in reality. Especially the key topics, are the problems that the country urgently needs to study. Therefore, the project we declare must not be divorced from the guide, and we must choose the topic around the guide. Second, it is very important to conduct a rigorous and scientific demonstration of the project. The quality of argument is the premise of deciding whether it can be passed. Because there are often several or even dozens of applicants for the same topic, which can be evaluated and which can't depends mainly on the argument. Experts see the argument mainly from the following points: first, why do you want to study this topic; 2. What problems does your research mainly solve? Third, what are the difficulties in solving the main problems, how to solve them and how to break through them; Fourth, the previous achievements. Therefore, you must be considerate when presenting, so that the judges can clearly know what you want to solve and what the difficulties are, which shows that you have the ability to solve these problems. Third, we should pay attention to the integration of the members of the research group. The materials of the members of the research group are the key to measure the level of the members of the research group and whether they can complete the task. In the past, there were only one or two applicants in the research group, or the structure was unreasonable and the membership level was not high. Although the demonstration was good, there was no project. Why pay so much attention to the members of the research group? Because the current subject research mainly depends on collective research, it is difficult for one person or two or three people to open and distribute fine products. Only when we cooperate, discuss with each other and give full play to collective wisdom can we produce fine products. The members of the research group should be reasonably matched and integrated. First, the combination of inside and outside the school, the combination of inside and outside the school, reflects the reasonable regional structure. Moreover, it is easy to obtain research data from different regions and reduce the research cost. Second, for applied research topics, research departments should be combined with practical work departments. In addition to theoretical workers, members should also include staff from some practical departments, which is convenient for inspection and also the embodiment of the principle of integrating theory with practice in the team structure. To study the subject of basic theory, it is necessary to have highly accomplished professors and young scholars with doctoral degrees to engage in theoretical research in this field. Thirdly, the combination of different research professionals reflects the rationality of the knowledge structure of the research team. For example, in terms of research methods, we all combine qualitative analysis with quantitative analysis, and it would be better if there were statistical analysis experts in the team. Fourth, the title, age and degree structure should be reasonable, reflecting the level of the research team and sustainable research ability. If the team is all professors in their fifties, the level is high on the surface, but there is no academic echelon, and the research stamina is insufficient. Of course, there are many other problems that need to be paid attention to, such as filling in the form truthfully, normatively and accurately in strict accordance with the requirements. Don't make the low-level mistake of filling in the wrong contents. It's not just the application period. Everyone should establish the concept of the project at ordinary times. Our liberal arts teachers, in particular, should strengthen the concept of topics. Taking subject research as an important duty, we fully realize that carrying out subject research is an important way to improve our scientific research ability and academic level, and it is also the need to promote teaching and improve teaching quality through scientific research.