/kloc-On the evening of October 8th, China Foundation announced the monthly average scale data of various asset management businesses in the second quarter of 2022. The average monthly scale of private placement management of TOP20 brokers reached 5.66 trillion yuan, a decrease of 235.5 billion yuan compared with 5.89 trillion yuan in the first quarter of this year, a decrease of about 4% from the previous month.
Due to the overall scale decline, maintaining the previous achievements is a victory. In the TOP20 list of the average monthly scale of private placement management, * * there are 1 1 brokers whose average monthly scale of private placement management decreased in the second quarter (excluding new companies). Among them, the average monthly scale of private equity management of CICC decreased from 704.566 billion yuan in the previous quarter to 547.043 billion yuan, a decrease of 654.38+057.523 billion yuan from the previous quarter and a decrease of about 22% from the previous quarter.
Looking back at the market situation in the first half of this year, the overall situation is to suppress first and then promote. In view of the reasons for the shrinking scale of private placement management of brokers in the second quarter, some market participants said that it was mainly affected by market conditions and channels, investor confidence and so on. In addition, it is not excluded that some institutions have stepped into the market, and the decline in net worth has led to a shrinking scale.
What is the specific ranking of asset management of securities firms? See the details.
More than half of the brokers' private placements have shrunk, and gold and investment have fallen by more than 20% from the previous month.
First of all, look at the overall situation: as far as the scale of private placement management of the top 20 brokers announced by the China Foundation is concerned, its total scale has reached 5.66 trillion yuan. Compared with 5.89 trillion yuan in the first quarter of this year, the scale in the second quarter decreased by 235.5 billion yuan, down about 4% from the previous quarter.
In terms of listing threshold, the red line of TOP20 brokers in the second quarter was 75.465 billion yuan (Dongfanghong Asset Management), slightly lower than the previous quarter. Zheshang Asset Management fell out of the top 20 list this quarter, with a scale of 77.948 billion yuan in the last quarter. The newcomer is Capital Securities. In the second quarter, the scale of private asset management was 79.63 billion yuan, ranking 19. In addition, other brokers are old faces.
In terms of ranking, CITIC Securities ranked first in the industry with a score of 10438+0792438+0 billion yuan this quarter. Its management scale is also quite stable, with a slight increase of 9.587 billion yuan in the second quarter.
BOC International Securities rose one place to the second place in the industry; In the second quarter, the scale of private equity asset management was 65.51.91billion yuan, a decrease of1344 million yuan from the previous month. In this regard, relevant persons of BOC International Securities said that in recent years, the active management transformation of the company's asset management business has achieved certain results, and the private asset management business has actively exerted its professional advantages, focusing on investment research, product structure, customer service and financial technology.
In addition, Zheng Guang Asset Management ranked two places in the second quarter, with a scale of 398.5./kloc-0.4 billion yuan, an increase of 39.089 billion yuan from the previous quarter; Caitong Asset Management rose by three places, with the scale of1162.67 million yuan, an increase of 8305438+0 billion yuan from the previous month. The ranking of Anxin Asset Management also rose by two places, with the scale of 65.438+004338 billion yuan, an increase of 5.293 billion yuan from the previous month.
It is noteworthy that in the second quarter, the scale of private equity asset management of Guo Jin Securities was 1 665,438+03.87 million yuan, an increase of 25765,438+060 million yuan from the previous month, with an increase of 18.95% from the previous month, ranking first in terms of growth rate and rising one place again. Looking back on the last quarter, the scale of private equity asset management of Guo Jin Securities increased by 44.66% month-on-month, with a one-time increase of five places. That is to say, in just half a year, the scale of private equity asset management of Guo Jin Securities has increased from 18 to 12, and the scale has also increased from below100 billion to over16 billion, with an increase of over 70%.
As the overall scale has shrunk by 4%, it is a victory to maintain the previous achievements. In this TOP20, * * * has 1 1 brokers, and the average monthly scale of private placement management declined in the second quarter (excluding new companies).
Among them, the average monthly scale of private placement management of CICC decreased from 704.566 billion yuan in the last quarter to 547.043 billion yuan, down 65.438+057.523 billion yuan from the previous quarter, down 22.36% from the previous quarter, and dropped one place. The scale of China Merchants Securities shrank by 77.74 billion yuan, down 20.77% from the previous month, ranking down two places. Guosen Securities shrank by 65.438+09.586 billion yuan, barely maintaining the level of 100 billion yuan, ranking down three places.
In view of the reasons for the decline in the scale of private placement management of brokers in the second quarter, some market participants said that it was mainly affected by market conditions and channels and investor confidence. In the first half of this year, the overall market showed a trend of first restraining and then rising. The market continued to fall in the first quarter, which triggered investor pessimism. Even after the correction of the market in the second quarter, the shrinkage of private equity management has not improved. In addition, it is not excluded that some institutions have stepped into the market, and the decline in net worth has led to a shrinking overall scale.
The scale of private equity subsidiaries of securities firms is stable, and CICC capital is riding the dust.
Compared with the scale of private placement management of securities firms, the management scale of private placement subsidiaries of securities firms is quite stable, and the top 20 are all elderly people in the last quarter, and the scale and ranking have not changed significantly.
Specifically, in the second quarter of 2022, CICC Capital, a subsidiary of CICC, ranked first in the average monthly scale of private equity funds, with an average monthly scale of 65.438+036.337 billion yuan, a slight increase of 65.438+0365.438+07 billion yuan from the previous month. At the same time, the scale of private equity investment of CICC in the second quarter was 65.438+07.449 billion yuan, a slight decrease of 573 million yuan from the previous quarter, and the ranking dropped by one place.
After CICC Capital, Huatai Zijin Investment under Huatai Securities and Jinshi Investment under CITIC Securities ranked second and third respectively. Compared with the previous quarter, the two companies exchanged rankings this quarter, but the scale changed little, reaching 42.822 billion yuan and 42.682 billion yuan respectively.
In terms of scale decline, Trade Wind Investment under Cinda Securities and Soochow Venture Capital under soochow securities decreased by 4.237 billion yuan and 3.949 billion yuan respectively in the second quarter, ranking fifth and 10 respectively, among which Soochow Venture Capital decreased by 4 places.
The issuance of ABS by enterprises has slowed down, and the average monthly scale has shrunk by over 90 billion.
In the first half of this year, both credit ABS and enterprise ABS issuance were tightened. Wind data shows that in the first quarter of this year, there were only three newly issued enterprises, ABS2 13, and the issuance amount was1894.44 million yuan; In the second quarter, 306 pieces were newly issued, with an issue amount of 303.78 billion yuan.
Although the number and scale of ABS issuance in the market rebounded in the second quarter, compared with the same period last year, the scale still dropped significantly. In the case of a limited number of new additions, the average monthly management scale of ABS in various institutions and enterprises has also declined. In the second quarter, the total scale of TOP20 institutions was 1.52 trillion yuan, which was more than 90 billion yuan lower than that of the previous quarter.
Judging from the list, the list of ABS management institutions in the second quarter was the same as that in the previous quarter, with only a slight change in ranking. Among them, 7 rose, 7 fell and 6 were flat. The threshold for listing dropped slightly, from 26.692 billion yuan in the previous quarter to 24.993 billion yuan.
Specifically, CITIC Securities continues to rank first in the industry with an average monthly scale of 235.432 billion yuan; Huatai Asset Management and Ping An Securities traded 65.438+06.368 billion yuan and 65.438+06.268 billion yuan respectively, down 65.438+061.21billion yuan and 2053 1 billion yuan respectively from the previous quarter.
In addition, the average monthly scale of enterprise ABS business of Cinda Securities in the second quarter was 86.767 billion yuan, down by over 16% from the previous quarter. In April this year, Cinda Securities was ordered by Beijing Securities Regulatory Bureau to make corrections due to problems in risk control and compliance in ABS business and investment banking business. At that time, the Beijing Securities Regulatory Bureau pointed out that Cinda Securities had not established an effective restraint and balance mechanism in the process of developing ABS business, and ABS business was illegal, risk management was absent, and information disclosure of some ABS projects was incomplete.
If you want to know more real-time financial news, please follow us.