October is coming. Recalculation and replacement of pension insurance has become a hot topic on the Internet, making headlines, indicating that retired workers are particularly concerned. There is a salary inquiry for retirees, and social pension insurance has entered a comprehensive stage all over the country. However, the number of pension services in 31 provinces is not uniform and different. The one with the largest distance can reach 5 diversification, which is unfair and just. Why can't the number of pension services be unified?

There are often such inquiries. This is because most retired workers feel that the length and level of the payment period of the old-age service insurance have long been shown in the old-age pension, transitional pension and personal account pension insurance. Is it true that the number of pension payments should not be used to repeatedly reflect "pay more, pay more for a long time" and artificially enlarge the regional difference of the old-age insurance?

At this stage, 13 provinces across the country have released the amount of pension services in 222, with the highest amount of 11,396 yuan in Shanghai; Followed by Beijing, 1182 yuan. The smallest is Heilongjiang Province, with 5865 yuan, followed by Henan Province, with 6355 yuan. Obviously, there is a diversified number of 5 between the highest and the least, which leads to a large difference in the pension insurance premiums paid in different provinces under the same retirement conditions. In other words, "different pay for equal work", it is not good for the social pension insurance to be co-ordinated nationwide, with the same amount of pension services, and the same amount of pension services. Is it feasible? Let's take a look at it correctly:

First, the relationship between the national overall planning of social endowment insurance and the base of pension service payment

In fact, the larger focus of retired workers' doubts depends on the national overall planning of social endowment insurance, which means that the number of pension service payments should be coordinated nationwide. In fact, there are some misunderstandings here: First, the national overall planning of social endowment insurance, only the national overall planning of pension insurance, while the social endowment insurance of administrative institutions and the basic pension insurance for urban and rural residents are combined. Second, the social pension insurance is co-ordinated nationwide, which is only co-ordinated nationwide in government, business process, system software and data information, which is conducive to the adjustment of the surplus and deficiency of stock funds and the full social distribution of pension insurance benefits. There is almost no such statement that the number of pensions is co-ordinated nationwide. In other words, there is no direct impact on the national overall planning of social endowment insurance and the amount of pension services.

Second, it is fair to link the amount of pension payment with the regional difference

However, in terms of economic strength, there are regional differences in social and economic development to a certain extent between coastal and central regions, northern and southern regions, border regions and non-border regions. In fact, the economic development is uneven, which is manifested in certain differences in salary income, consumption level and capital guarantee.

At this stage, the provincial-level overall planning of the amount of pension services is not realized because the regional differences are fully considered. Looking back, if you pay according to the local minimum social security payment base and don't work in Shanghai and pay social insurance premiums, after retirement, you will enjoy the amount of pension services in Shanghai of 11,396 yuan, which is likely to lead to a difference of nearly 1, yuan, which is equivalent to pulling up and down the height limit on the amount of pension services. Therefore, if the number of pension payments is linked to the regional difference and egalitarianism is implemented, it is not conducive to social security payment and does not conform to the service tenet of "pay more, pay more for a long time" for social pension insurance. For this matter, the place where the old-age insurance is received is clear, and it must meet the social security payment period of not less than 1 years. That is to say, only when the local social security payment has reached 1 years or more, can you have the opportunity to enjoy the local pension service payment.

Therefore, it is indeed a great expectation of very large retired workers that the number of pension payments is unified nationwide, and everyone hopes that it can be true. However, the feasibility analysis is not great at present, and there are only three necessary conditions to hope: First, the pension service insurance payment base is unified nationwide, with equal pay; Second, the pension fund has sufficient surplus and is distributed in full; Third, the social and economic development of 31 provinces is relatively balanced and the economic development is comprehensive.

do you think the amount of pension payment is unified throughout the country? Warmly welcome to leave a message in the comment area, thank you for your praise and exchange, and let more people know the latest trends of social security and pensions.