The fund amounts of Fund A and Fund C are different and calculated separately.

For those who often invest in funds, you may have noticed this: some fund products are marked with a after their names, and some fund products are marked with C after their names. Strictly speaking, these two new products belong to the same product, but their charging models are completely different. In order to meet the needs of more investors, the fund company will separate Fund A and Fund C.

1. The two quotas are not compatible with each other.

Let’s take a random example. If you buy Fund A of a certain fund product, you will find that the daily net value and stock holdings of Fund A are exactly the same as those of Fund C. This is because the two funds themselves are They belong to the same fund, but they subscribe separately, so the scale is also different. You can understand the main difference between Fund A and Fund C as the difference in subscription and redemption fees. Other aspects are exactly the same.

Second, this is done in response to market demand.

I remember reading a piece of data before. Currently, the general investment cycle of most investors in the market is within three months. In order to further respond to this data and meet the needs of investors, the fund company launched Fund A and Fund C. For short-term investors with a relatively short investment cycle, it is generally better to choose Fund C, because Fund C has no subscription fee. For long-term investors, it is more reliable to choose Fund A because Fund C has the lowest comprehensive rate.

3. The fee rates of Fund A and Fund C are different.

For Fund A, Fund A generally has subscription fees and redemption fees. The longer you hold it, the less fees you pay.

For Fund C, Fund C does not need to pay a subscription fee, but it does have a service fee. The service fee is calculated on a daily basis, and the service fee will be deducted from your fund's net value in real time every day.

To sum up, the quotas of Fund A and Fund C are not mutually exclusive, but they are the same product and enjoy the same position ratio, but the service rates are completely different.