Tesla’s release of data violates personal privacy, and this behavior indeed constitutes infringement:

1. Information involving the identity characteristics of natural persons should be private information;

2. Publishing the information to the public without the consent of the parties concerned constitutes an infringement of privacy rights;

3. These private information should belong to the car owner, not the company.

At the Tesla Auto Show in Shanghai, the incident of a female car owner stepping on the roof of the car and shouting loudly to protect her rights and interests has attracted the attention of many netizens and has begun to continue to brew and ferment. Tesla first refused to admit this behavior and took a tough stance. Finally, it publicly apologized in the middle of the night and released 30 minutes of driving data. 1. Vehicle safety issues, there is a big dispute between the two parties

When the rights-defending car owner took Tesla to court, the camera on the road where the vehicle was driving could not capture the full picture of the vehicle, and the vehicle was also There was no driving recorder installed, so the driving information of the vehicle, which is the original data, became the only evidence. Faced with the brake failure at 118 kilometers per hour provided by Tesla, the victim also had doubts. Moreover, the display results of vehicle certification reports provided by car owners or third parties are inconsistent with the reports provided by Tesla. But in the end, the court ruled in favor of the victim based on the third-party certification data. 2. The role of vehicle driving information

In the absence of any valid evidence, the original driving information of the vehicle has become the fundamental and key to solving this incident. Because this driving information can determine whether the driver's improper operation caused the accident or whether the vehicle itself had driving safety hazards that caused the accident. Or there may be a problem with the hardware of the vehicle itself. Since the client was still in custody, Tesla mailed more than 6,000 driving records to the mailbox left by the client without being able to contact him, and provided about one minute of data. This is also the main point of contention between the two sides. 3. Who should own the original driving information of the vehicle?

This question should undoubtedly concern vehicle owners. According to Tesla, I have provided services to you. This data is only for reference and does not belong to you. This statement is wrong. It should be clearly stated in the contract when purchasing a car. This part of the data belongs entirely to the customer. And when I need it, you must be able to take it out at any time. This is your obligation. In other words, vehicle companies must provide a channel through which vehicle owners can easily retrieve this information anytime and anywhere.

This incident should also sound a warning to smart car manufacturing and production companies. If you want to make progress, you must start from the fundamentals.