Candidates should be roughly familiar with the departmental laws being tested and the content of each law based on the syllabus and the designated textbooks for the judicial examination. Taking civil law as an example, the legal articles examined include the "General Principles of Civil Law", "Guarantee Law", "Contract Law", "Marriage Law", "Succession Law", "Trademark Law", "Patent Law" and "Copyright". Law, etc., as well as relevant judicial interpretations of the laws of various departments (candidates can clarify the specific examination scope from the judicial examination syllabus of that year).
1. The starting point for reviewing the content of the judicial examination is best arranged according to the proportion of scores of each department's laws. For example, you can review criminal law or civil law first;
2 . In terms of the order of review for the judicial examination, it is recommended to adopt the method of "substantive law + procedural law", such as "civil law + civil procedure law", "criminal law + criminal procedure law", "administrative law + administrative procedure law", etc. etc., such a review method can not only bridge the barriers between substantive law and procedural law, but also correspond to each other and promote memory and understanding.
3. Micro review, that is, review of laws specific to each department. You should first master the relevant theoretical knowledge in the designated textbooks for the judicial examination, then integrate the legal provisions and judicial interpretations, and finally study the past papers and analyze them. methods and test points. Generally speaking, the test points in the past examination questions are "constantly weighted", that is, the repetition rate is very high. However, judging from the 2004 examination questions, the content involved in the judicial examination tends to be comprehensive. Therefore, we must avoid the misunderstanding that only relying on past test points for review will be biased.
4. Review the knowledge points that focus on memorization later. Due to the effect of memory rules and intensive review, it is impossible to memorize for a long time, so this knowledge point with high memorability should be "postponed". For example, legal history, jurisprudence, international public law, etc.
In addition to the above four principles, the author recommends that candidates not only rely on their "eyes" and "brain" when reviewing for the Division Examination, but also learn to use their "hands", that is, they must be good at summarizing. There are two reasons for adopting this approach: First, it helps with memory. As the saying goes, "a good memory cannot keep up with a bad writing"; second, because the designated textbooks for the judicial examination are very detailed, it would be a waste if every stage of review is reviewed page by page. It is burdensome, and the outline is too simple, so candidates should prepare their own "review guide" to systematize the knowledge points involved. For example, you can write down the main systems included in the test points, and what are the key points of each system. Doubts even include the "inspiration and sparks" that flashed during the review process. You may feel that the workload is relatively heavy in the first stage of review, but in the final stage I believe there will be an obvious effect of getting twice the result with half the effort.
(2) The "digestion" stage of knowledge
The review in the first stage has laid a relatively solid foundation, and the second stage will further consolidate the knowledge and knowledge on this basis. Improve application ability. At this stage, it is recommended to use a comparative analysis method to facilitate understanding and strengthen memory. For example, comparative analysis between the three major litigation laws, comparison of the rights and obligations of the parties at different stages of litigation, etc. In addition, it is necessary to analyze and compare the test points in the past years to see which ones are the "constant key points" of the judicial examination and which contents have not been covered. You should also carefully study the problem-solving ideas and problem-solving techniques in the answer analysis, especially Answers to case analysis questions and essay questions.
(3) The "absorption" stage of knowledge
This stage is the stage of checking for deficiencies and filling in the gaps. Candidates can choose one or two sets of high-quality simulation questions for practice to test their ability to actually apply knowledge. Supplement the knowledge that you have not mastered or do not master thoroughly, and strengthen important knowledge points.
The review at each stage should be comprehensive and partial. Since the review content for the Judicial Examination is very complex, it is impossible to cover everything and must be focused. For example, laws with a large score ratio need to be reviewed comprehensively. You cannot just rely on key legal provisions and past exam questions. However, for some departmental laws (such as economic law), you do not need to memorize and understand them one by one. You can prepare for the exam by thoroughly understanding the test points and key legal provisions of previous years' real questions. Special mention should be made here about the review of administrative law. On the one hand, the administrative law questions are difficult, and on the other hand, the content of the administrative law part of the designated textbooks for the judicial examination is not very systematic, so it is best to use an undergraduate textbook as a reference. Contribute to the understanding of relevant knowledge. Finally, the author believes that during the review process, you should not just read the legal provisions at the literal level, but should analyze the legal spirit behind the legal provisions, so that you can truly grasp the knowledge points.
The above is the author’s experience in the review process of the Division Examination. I hope it will be helpful to the candidates. During the preparation period, you must maintain a good attitude and believe that God will reward those who work hard. I wish all candidates good luck!
Regarding the review method of civil law, I have another feeling, that is, do not engage in the "question-filled tactic". A large number of currently published solutions to various examination questions can undoubtedly be used as reference materials for candidates to review. However, when teachers set questions, they always focus on the theoretical system and teaching points of civil law teaching. Therefore, the only way to solve questions is to master the question types and One way to improve question-answering skills is to put the cart before the horse if you fall into a sea of ??questions and relax your grasp of basic concepts, basic systems and basic theories. On the contrary, if you have mastered the basic concepts, basic systems and basic theories very well, no matter how the exam syllabus changes, and no matter what form the examiner uses to conduct the examination, the so-called "the original principles will never change", the candidates can strategize and win.
The effect is remarkable when used in conjunction with famous teacher training courses. The use of audio materials from Wanguo and Three Schools (it is recommended to buy a large-capacity MP3)