When it comes to assembling a computer, the topic of processor is inseparable. The choice of processor will directly determine the running speed of a computer. There are only two processor manufacturers we can choose from in the world. Home, one is Intel and the other is AMD. Now the mainstream processor series of these two processor manufacturers are Ryzen and Core. So for beginners, what is the difference between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Core? How to choose? Now Yiyi Jiang will talk to you about this issue.
How to choose if you only consider playing games
For gamers, Yiyijiang still recommends Intel Core processors. This does not mean that Ryzen is not good for playing games. I will explain below. Explain the main reasons. It is definitely wrong to say that Ryzen is not good at playing games. It can only be said that the Ryzen processor is not as good as Intel's Core series in supporting some mainstream online games. The most famous one is the Tencent series of games. I think everyone has played games produced by Tencent. The Ryzen processor is really different from Intel's Core series in Tencent games. Since Tencent games only use single-thread frequency and are not optimized for multi-core processors, Choosing Ryzen to play games, especially Tencent games, is a disadvantage.
But here Yiyi Jiang also wants to vindicate Ryzen. If you rarely play online games and play a lot of stand-alone games, it is good to choose Ryzen. There is really a gap between the current game masterpieces Ryzen and Core. Not big, like eating chicken.
Multiple applications and work require high processor performance
But for most people, gaming is a pastime after all, and the computer is still used as a productivity tool. In this case For the same price, don’t choose Intel’s Core series, choose Ryzen instead! But Yiyijiang would also like to remind everyone that it is best to choose the second-generation Ryzen processor, and if you can afford to buy one with It would be difficult for Bai. Since the Ryzen processor has more cores and threads than the Intel processor at the same price, it is faster than the Intel Core in multi-opening, rendering, video PS, etc. The CPU usage is also very high when viewed from the task manager. It can illustrate the problem. Often the Core processor is full and the Ryzen processor is only half used.
Finally, Yiyi Jiang makes a summary. If you are poor and still want performance, then choose Ryzen. If you only play games and do nothing else, choose the Core series. The higher the single-core frequency, the better the gaming performance. The stronger. After all, the reason why Ryzen is not as good as the Intel Core series in gaming is because the single core frequency is not high enough. At the same frequency, Ryzen will definitely beat the Core series processors. I wonder if you have any different opinions? Welcome to leave a message and comment to discuss!
Regarding this issue, it is estimated that there are many posts on the Internet specifically using Ryzen processors for evaluation. Basically, they use Ryzen R71700x and Intel i7 7700k and 6700k for evaluation. The results are as follows. I used them for the following evaluation. Picture of Script House. I don’t like to directly copy other results, so I still indicate the source.
It can be seen from the test results that the Ryzen series performs very well, which is due to the advantage of having many threads, and most professional applications such as rendering, modeling, and coding have particularly obvious needs for multi-threading. , at this time, the advantage of multi-core and multi-threaded AMD Ryzen is relatively obvious; Ryzen 7 1700 vs. i7-7700K with 8 cores and 16 threads pk 4 cores and 8 threads may be a bit overpowering, but their prices are indeed very similar.
When Ryzen 7 1700X versus i7-6800K, Ryzen has both the price and performance advantages!
The following are the test results of several games
The test results can be seen that in terms of game performance, Ryzen is almost completely defeated by Intel, and compared with Intel i7-7700K and other Intel It can be seen from the i7 CPU that in terms of game performance, the i7-7700K almost completely suppresses other models. The fundamental reason is that the games currently developed by game companies do not have in-depth optimization of multi-threading. Even if you provide 16 threads, only 6 to 8 threads can actually be called. Therefore, under this premise, high frequency and single-core The advantage of strong performance is even more obvious.
In summary, judging from the current reviews on major websites, the Ryzen series running scores and multi-threaded tasks are very strong, but the single-core and game performance need to be improved. On the one hand, game companies have optimized the Ryzen series On the other hand, it needs to be optimized. AMD itself has said that the new generation of Ryzen is not yet fully optimized for games and is stepping up its efforts to optimize it. It is estimated that this problem will be solved in the next generation version. Let's wait and see!
Intel and AMD are both leading chip companies in the United States.
Intel and AMD are actually a pair of competitors (good friends). When one party lags behind in market share or technology products, the other party will continue to suppress it (squeeze out toothpaste, stuff money) . Because once one party is squeezed out of the market, the other party can monopolize the market share, expand the company's scale, take orders from big bosses, and reach the peak of the company (dismantled by the anti-monopoly mechanism...)
The above is used Just for fun, now let’s get serious, why is Intel’s market share higher than AMD’s (the current consumer market is overtaken by AMD)? The main reason is that a few years ago, AMD released the bulldozer frame (FX) series, and the bulldozer frame was so popular that Intel was so exaggerated that it even offered a 55% discount on all CPUs on sale at the time. The publicity effect at that time was like this: (Huh? Where did the popularity come from? )
However, everyone knew that i3 was silently seconds later, so there is no need to explain it further.
Then Intel started squeezing out toothpaste. It is said that the first 50% of toothpaste can only be used for one month, but the second 50% can be used for one-twelfth of a year. The toothpaste of the Core 7 generation is so crowded that even AMD can’t stand it anymore, and it has created a magic curse machine that makes the toothpaste fall to the ground as soon as it is squeezed (Zen architecture Ryzen, this is the product below)
Intel is so angry I stepped on the toothpaste, which was a big step. I stepped on an i9 and an 8th generation Core. AMD quickly researched countermeasures (since the quality is insufficient, it should focus on quantity, and use new processes to plug in more transistors), and the second generation of Magic Cursed Machine (2nd Generation Ryzen) was born. But unfortunately, the anti-magic ability of Intel Core 8 is too strong, and AMD has no way to deal with it. No, AMD has released a second-generation toothpaste tube ripper with 32 combined chainsaws (if magic doesn’t work, just physics) to fight against Intel’s powerful i9 anti-magic adaptive machine. (It’s the one below)
Let Intel’s 28-level anti-physical damage adaptive toothpaste recovery machine soaked in water be ashamed of itself.
Hey, hey, there seems to be something wrong with the style of painting.
Ahem, don’t worry about these details. In fact, Intel and AMD have their own merits. Intel focuses on single-core performance (games), while AMD focuses on hyper-threading performance (design). Of course this is not the point.
The point is that AMD is cheap
The point is that AMD is cheap
The point is that AMD is cheap
AMD is cheap
MD is cheap
D is cheap
Cheap
Yiah
Ah
Look Since Pei Wei is so careful in making up stories, you should pay attention to him
Hello,
Ryzen's processor has an advantage in multi-core computing capabilities,
The price is relatively close to the people.
The single-core processing power of the Core processor is stronger than that of the Ryzen, and the gaming experience is better.
I can recommend you to get Lenovo’s Thinkpad series.
This series of notebooks is mainly for workplace business and has a more classic appearance. Most processors use low-voltage energy-saving processors, which have low power consumption, low heat generation, and low requirements for heat dissipation modules. Laptops using this kind of CPU can often be made thin and light, and can achieve long battery life when the battery is sufficient. It is suitable for people traveling on business, people holding long-term meetings, and also suitable for students visiting the library.
And Thinkpad is a computer originally owned by IBM. It is known for its durability and reliability and has a high reputation in the market. After being acquired by Lenovo, it continued its consistent style and its performance is still quite outstanding.
In terms of heat dissipation, it uses a dual heat pipe system. The computer's heat sink and metal bracket cooling system can effectively dissipate the heat generated by the processor evenly around it, which can not only save power but also extend the service life of the hardware.
The same-frequency performance is already on par, AMD's memory control is poor, and the price/performance ratio is good.
The difference between AMDryzen Ryzen processors and Intel Core processors is that the main frequency is lower, and the single-core performance is not as good as Intel's Core processors. Fortunately, the number of cores is large, and multi-cores are relied on in some productivity tools. The advantages are different from those of Intel.
The low clock speed was held back by the manufacturing process, because AMD did not have its own manufacturing plant. It had sold it before and later due to financial problems, and it is now Global Foundries (GF).
AMD Ryzen processors are all produced by (GF) OEM, using the 14nm production process. If Ryzen can keep up with the manufacturing process in the later period, the main frequency may not be worse than Intel's.
AMD
AMD was founded in Silicon Valley in 1969 with only a few dozen employees. Since then, AMD has embarked on a path of innovation and has always been at the forefront of semiconductor products. Cutting edge. From humble beginnings as a company, AMD has grown into a global company with tens of thousands of employees and has achieved many breakthrough industry innovations. AMD is working hard today to develop high-performance computing and visualization products to solve the world's toughest and most interesting challenges. These are the best times in the semiconductor industry, and we are ready to continue to innovate for the next 50 years, working hard to create high-performance computing and graphics technologies that make our lives better.
Intel
Intel is an American company that mainly develops CPUs. It is the world's largest manufacturer of personal computer parts and CPUs. It was founded in 1968 and has 51 years of product innovation and A history of market leadership.
In 1971, Intel launched the world's first microprocessor. The computer and Internet revolution brought about by microprocessors has changed the entire world. Ranked 51st among the Fortune Global 500 in 2016. On February 19, 2014, Intel launched the processor Xeon E7 v2 series, which uses up to 15 processor cores, becoming Intel's processor with the largest number of cores.
On March 5, 2014, Intel acquired Basis Science, the manufacturer of the smart watch Basis Health Tracker Watch. On August 14, 2014, Intel acquired the network business of Avago's company for US$650 million. In December 2015, it spent US$16.7 billion to acquire Altera. At the end of April 2016, an Intel spokesperson confirmed that two new versions of the mobile processor Atom product line originally scheduled to be launched in 2016 would be canceled. In other words, Intel would withdraw from the smartphone chip market.
In July 2016, Intel announced the largest layoff plan in the company's history, preparing to cut 12,000 people. On October 28, 2016, the 2016 Intel China Industry Summit was held in Zhuhai. On November 30, 2016, Intel was forming the Automated Driving Group (ADG). On June 21, 2018, Intel announced that it had accepted the resignation of CEO Brian Krzanich. Chief Financial Officer Robert “Bob” Swan was named interim CEO, and he became full CEO on January 31, 2019.
In December 2018, the "Top 500 World Brands 2018" compiled by the World Brand Laboratory was announced, and Intel ranked 17th. In July 2019, Intel's second quarter net profit was US$4.179 billion, a year-on-year decrease of 17%. Ranked 13 among the top 100 global brands in 2019.
The difference between Intel processors and AMD processors:
1. Processor price
In terms of price, AMD processors with the same clock speed are only handled by Intel Half the price of the processor; this is the attraction of AMD processors, good overclocking performance and low price. Many friends who choose AMD processors value this. This is the advantage of AMD processors.
2. Processor overclocking performance
In terms of overclocking performance, all Intel processors are multiplier-locked and have little advantage in overclocking; while AMD processors The multiplier is also locked, but it can still be overclocked, but the overclocking range is relatively small.
3. Processor performance
In terms of processor performance, there is no doubt that Intel processors have the performance advantages of strong single-core performance, strong stability, and advanced technology. For example, in the latest ladder chart, Intel processors are also at the top;
At the current stage, for the x86 architecture, both AMD and Intel have roughly optimized it to the limit, and turbo-boost is also available in AMD's next-generation CPU. , and hyper-threading technology will also be built into AMD's next-generation CPU, but AMD cannot call its technology hyper-threading due to trademark reasons.
From the perspective of CPU performance, there is no difference to ordinary people and they cannot feel it. However, the prices of the two are different, the motherboards are different, the heat generation is different, and the radiator installation methods are different. If both are APUs, AMD's 3D performance is much better than Intel's.