Reply to the review materials 1. A copy of the corporate business license (with official seal) 2. The concept and use of the trademark (mainly highlighting the popularity) 3. Company profile 4. Various honors obtained by the company 5 .The company's sales, advertising expenses and related financial conditions in the past three years. 6. Originals and copies of corporate media reports or picture advertisements 7. Originals and copies of the appearance of the products sold by the company 8. Other evidence and materials that can prove the company's products and popularity 9. Documents proving the earliest use of this trademark 10. The applicant needs to The evidence materials submitted shall be classified and numbered one by one and a catalog list shall be made. The sources of the evidence materials and the specific facts proved shall be briefly explained and the official seal shall be affixed. Matters needing attention when it comes to trademark rejection review time. According to the relevant provisions of the "Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China" and its "Implementing Rules": 1. If the trademark review application is sent and received by mail, the 15-day review time limit is calculated. The postmark dates of receipt of the letter and the date of issuance of the letter by the local post office shall be regarded as the date of receipt and issuance by the party; if the postmark is unclear or there is no postmark, the date of issuance by the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (hereinafter referred to as the Trademark Office) shall be marked. An extension of 20 days shall be deemed as the date of receipt by the party, or the date on which the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (hereinafter referred to as the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board) received the trademark review application shall be deemed as the date of issuance by the party. When the party or trademark agency submits the trademark review document, it should provide the envelope mailed by the Trademark Office in order to calculate the date on which the party received the rejection notice from the Trademark Office. 2. For Madrid international registered trademark review applications, *** the review time limit starts from the date marked on the rejection notice issued by the International Bureau. If the date of issuance by the International Bureau cannot be provided, the date shall be calculated from the date marked on the trademark rejection notice issued by the Trademark Office to the International Bureau. 3. The parties concerned shall apply for trademark review within the time limit specified by law. Due to force majeure or other legitimate reasons, you can apply for an extension of 30 days before expiration. However, the extension fee shall be paid by the applicant. The extension application shall be submitted within 15 days from the date of receipt of the rejection notice from the Trademark Office, and the extension period shall be calculated from the 16th day. 4. Since the time limit review of an extension application can only be conducted when the reexamination application is received, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board will not conduct a time limit review when receiving the extension application, but will conduct a time limit review together with the formal review application. review. If the legal time limit is exceeded, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board will not accept the application and notify the party or agent in writing. 1. Power of attorney; 2. Copy of business license; 3. Rejected trademark registration application, refutation/objection ruling (with an envelope from the Trademark Office), and evidentiary materials. Rejection is a common review result in the trademark registration application process. Usually there are rejections that violate prohibitive regulations, and the trademark is not distinctive. According to Article 32 of the Trademark Law, you can file a rejection review application with the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board. . The first two types of rejection review only involve the Trademark Office and the applicant for the rejected trademark, but the third type, that is, the rejection review due to conflict with prior trademark rights, is more complicated. The author mainly discusses this type of rejection review. This type of rejection review involves three parties: the Trademark Office, the applicant for the rejected trademark, and the owner of the earlier trademark. If the applicant for the rejected trademark has no dispute over the rights of the earlier trademark cited by the Trademark Office, the reason for filing the rejection review is simply that the goods are not Similar, if the trademarks are not similar, there is nothing special about them. However, if the applicant for the rejected trademark disputes the rights of the cited earlier trademark and believes that the application for the cited trademark is a malicious preemptive registration that violates the relevant provisions of the Trademark Law, or that it infringes upon the applicant's earlier business name rights, patent rights, copyrights, etc., that is, it is believed that the cited prior trademark rights themselves were illegally obtained and should not become an obstacle to the rejected trademark application for registration. Since this type of rejection review is no longer limited to a review of the Trademark Office's ruling, but involves the interests of third parties, and has characteristics similar to trademark legal affairs such as opposition and revocation, the situation becomes more complicated. Trademark review