1．. Chinese trademarks are identical in Chinese characters, but different in font, design, phonetic notation and arrangement order, which may easily mislead the relevant public about the source of goods or services, and are judged as approximate trademarks.

2. if a trademark is composed of the same foreign language, letters or numbers, but only the font or design is different, it is easy for the relevant public to misunderstand the source of goods or services, and it is judged as an approximate trademark.

3. A trademark consists of two foreign words, but the word order is different, and there is no obvious difference in meaning, which is likely to mislead the relevant public about the source of goods or services, and it is judged as an approximate trademark.

4. if a Chinese trademark consists of three or more Chinese characters, only a few Chinese characters are different, and the whole meaning is meaningless or there is no obvious difference, which may easily mislead the relevant public about the source of goods or services, it is judged as an approximate trademark.

5. A trademark in a foreign language consists of four or more letters, and only a few letters are different, and the whole meaning is meaningless or there is no obvious difference in meaning, which is likely to mislead the relevant public about the source of goods or services, and it is judged as an approximate trademark.

6. a trademark is judged to be an approximate trademark if its characters are similar and it is easy for the relevant public to misunderstand the source of goods or services.

7. trademarks with identical or similar pronunciations, similar glyphs or overall appearance may easily mislead the relevant public about the source of goods or services, and are judged as similar trademarks.

8. if the words of a trademark are identical or similar, which may easily mislead the relevant public about the source of goods or services, it shall be judged as an approximate trademark.

9. Trademark words are formed by overlapping words, which may easily mislead the relevant public about the source of goods or services, and are judged as approximate trademarks.

1. A foreign-language trademark is judged to be similar if it only changes in form, such as singular and plural, gerund, abbreviation, added article, comparative degree or superlative degree, part of speech, etc., but the meanings expressed are basically the same, which is likely to mislead the relevant public about the source of goods or services.

11. A trademark is a similar trademark because the common name and model of the commodity are added to other people's prior trademarks, which may easily mislead the relevant public about the source of the goods or services.

12. A trademark is a similar trademark because some words indicating the place where goods are produced, sold or used are added to other people's prior trademarks, which may easily mislead the relevant public about the source of goods or services.

13. A trademark is a word that directly indicates the quality, main raw materials, function, use, weight, quantity and other characteristics of a commodity in another person's prior trademark, which may easily mislead the relevant public about the source of the commodity or service, and is judged as an approximate trademark.

14. A trademark is an adjective or adverb that plays a modifying role and other words that are less prominent in the trademark. The meanings expressed are basically the same, and it is easy for the relevant public to misunderstand the source of goods or services, and it is judged as an approximate trademark.

15. if two trademarks or one of them consists of two or more relatively independent parts, and the significant parts are similar, it is easy for the relevant public to misunderstand the source of goods or services, and it is judged as similar trademarks.

16. if a trademark completely contains word mark, which has a certain popularity or strong distinctiveness in the past, and it is easy for the relevant public to think that it belongs to a series of trademarks and misunderstand the source of goods or services, it is judged as an approximate trademark. 1. If the composition of a trademark graphic is similar to the overall appearance, and it is easy for the relevant public to misunderstand the source of goods or services, it is judged as an approximate trademark.

2. a trademark is judged as an approximate trademark if it completely contains a graphic trademark that others have a certain popularity or strong distinctiveness in advance, which may easily make the relevant public think that it belongs to a series of trademarks and cause misunderstanding about the source of goods or services. 1. If the Chinese characters of a trademark are identical or similar, and it is easy for the relevant public to misunderstand the source of goods or services, it is judged as an approximate trademark.

2. if the foreign language, letters and figures of a trademark are identical or similar, which may easily mislead the relevant public about the source of goods or services, it is judged as an approximate trademark.

3. if the main meanings of words in different languages in a trademark are the same or basically the same, and it is easy for the relevant public to misunderstand the source of goods or services, it is judged as an approximate trademark.

4. if the graphic parts of a trademark are similar, and it is easy for the relevant public to misunderstand the source of goods or services, it is judged as an approximate trademark.

5. A trademark with different characters and graphics, but with basically the same arrangement and combination or overall description, makes the overall appearance or meaning of the trademark similar, and easily causes the relevant public to misunderstand the source of the goods or services, so it is judged as an approximate trademark.