Personal feelings are different, and Zhonggong gives me a relatively better feeling. Of course, this is purely a personal feeling. Huatu's interview training is more serious, and the traces of routines are relatively obvious. It teaches candidates a relatively fixed pattern to conquer the world. In this way, the chance of making mistakes in the interview is smaller, but it is not easy to get high scores; Zhonggong's words are relatively natural. , more emphasis is placed on candidates summarizing their own ideas for answering questions. Of course, some basic methods and methods will still be mentioned, but the overall emphasis is still on candidates having their own things. In this way, the requirements for candidates themselves will be higher, and more Helps fundamentally improve candidates' ability to cope with interviews. Today's interviews do emphasize the so-called anti-routine. The examiner listens to the answer to the same question dozens of times a day. If the traces of routine are too obvious, it will easily arouse the examiner's resentment. Everyone can figure this out. So when it comes to the interview, it is better to be more natural. It would be better to use less clichés such as "report to the leader in a timely manner" and "summary in a timely manner" and more real "dry things". This is especially true for those candidates who expect a comeback in the interview. The so-called "highlights" in the interview are sometimes the implementation of false and empty clichés into relatively concrete measures. For example, a friend of mine said this when talking about timely summary reports during the interview. I personally think it is very good: "I will use the form of "Work Diary" to summarize the problems encountered at work, solutions and some personal achievements. All my ideas and suggestions must be recorded completely, so that the leader will have relatively detailed written information as a reference when evaluating my work. If another colleague takes over my work one day, this "Diary" can also help him to be more accurate. So you can start working faster. "If you have obvious advantages in the written test and your interview skills are average, you can consider applying to Huatu, and get a mid-to-high score, and get a solid finish; if you expect to make a comeback in the interview. , then Zhonggong may be more suitable. Of course, this is purely a personal opinion and is for reference only. In fact, I think the best way to prepare for interviews is to practice more on your own. Find a few candidates who have to participate in the interview to do mock interviews together. Ask a few young civil servants who have passed the exam in recent years to be mock examiners. It would be better if you can invite government officials who have been interview examiners. Conduct it every 2-3 days. In a mock interview, the questions are based on previous real questions. One candidate answers, then other candidates add, and the examiner comments. Doing this for two or three weeks can greatly broaden the candidates' thinking, which is very effective.